ArticlePsychological services2019
A qualitative study of veterans' mixed emotional reactions to receiving a PTSD diagnosis.
Article in Psychological services, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and facilitators for mental health care for operational stress injuries in the military: A qualitative study.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2025Article
- Participants' experiences of a counsellor-supported PTSD Coach intervention in a resource-constrained setting.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many veterans do not engage in needed mental health care. To address this problem, we need to understand these patients' experiences from the very start of their care, which includes the assessment and diagnosis process and the communication of that diagnosis to the patient. The patient's reaction to this process can set the tone for the patient's relationship with the mental health system and his or her therapist, yet therapists often receive little training in how to most effectively provide a diagnosis to patients. Prior research has examined emotional reactions to receiving a psychotic spectrum diagnosis, which sometimes included both positive and negative reactions, but to the authors' knowledge, no work has examined reactions to receiving a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. This qualitative study expands upon that work by examining common reactions to receipt of a PTSD diagnosis among low treatment-engaging veterans, changes in that reaction over the first few weeks postdiagnosis, and differences among reactions across veterans who initiate versus refuse evidence-based psychotherapy. Among 50 participants, self-reported reactions were categorized as positive, neutral, and negative. Positive reactions included validation, hope, and proactivity; neutral reactions included confusion, uncertainty, and acceptance; and negative reactions included shock, denial, and fear of stigma. We discuss recommendations for therapists in providing diagnoses in a patient-centered, cognitive-behavioral therapy-consistent way, to maximize the chances of engaging patients into mental health care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.