Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30058403›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2018

Prospects for a MERS-CoV spike vaccine.

Yusen Zhou, Shibo Jiang, Lanying Du

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AnHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paving New Roads UsingIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  15. Advances in mRNA and other vaccines against MERS-CoV.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusen Zhoua State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , China.
Shibo Jiangb Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center , New York , NY , USA.
Lanying Dub Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center , New York , NY , USA.
Institute of Microbiology · CNNew York Blood Center · USShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Structure-based design of coronavirus subunit vaccinesR01AI139092 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI DU, LANYING · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
Rational design and evaluation of novel mRNA vaccines against MERS-CoVR01AI137472 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI DU, LANYING · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
A novel nanobody with good druggability to prevent and treat MERS-CoV infectionR21AI128311 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI DU, LANYING · 2017 to 2018
$483k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137472NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139092NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSix years have passed since Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus (MERS-CoV), a newly emerging infectious virus, was first reported in 2012. Although MERS-CoV has had a consistently high mortality rate in humans, no vaccines have been approved to prevent MERS-CoV infection in humans. MERS-CoV spike (S) protein is a key target for development of MERS vaccines. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we illustrate the structure and function of S protein as a vaccine target, describe available animal models for evaluating MERS vaccines, and summarize recent progress on MERS-CoV S-based vaccines, focusing on their ability to elicit antibody and/or cellular immune responses, neutralizing antibodies, and protection against MERS-CoV infection in different models. Prospects for future MERS-CoV S-based vaccines are discussed. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The majority of MERS vaccines under development are based on MERS-CoV S protein, including full-length S, S1, and receptor-binding domain (RBD). While it is essential to evaluate the safety of full-length S and S1-based MERS vaccines, further improvement of the efficacy of RBD-based vaccines using novel strategies would be necessary. Overall, this review provides informative guidance for designing and developing safe and effective MERS vaccines based on viral S protein.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingCoronavirus InfectionsHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusProtein BindingSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Vaccinesimmune responsesMERSMERS-CoVneutralizing antibodiesprotectionreceptor-binding domainspike proteinvaccine

Identifiers

PMID30058403
PMCPMC6355461
OpenAlexW2884583470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.