Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30058233›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2018

Direct Comparison of SIRT2 Inhibitors: Potency, Specificity, Activity-Dependent Inhibition, and On-Target Anticancer Activities.

Nicole A Spiegelman, Ian R Price, Hui Jing, Miao Wang, Min Yang, Ji Cao, Jun Young Hong, Xiaoyu Zhang, Pornpun Aramsangtienchai, Sushabhan Sadhukhan and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sirt2 inhibition improves gut epithelial barrier integrity and protects mice from colitis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole A SpiegelmanDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Ian R PriceDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Hui JingDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Miao WangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Min YangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Ji CaoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jun Young HongDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Xiaoyu ZhangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Pornpun AramsangtienchaiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Sushabhan SadhukhanDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Hening LinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-2701
Cornell University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Chemical Approaches for Studying the Biology of NAD-consuming EnzymesR01GM086703 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, HENING · 2009 to 2017
$2.5M
Broad wavelength range Zeiss 780 NLO/confocal system for the Cornell Imaging CoreS10OD018516 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ZIPFEL, WARREN R · 2014 to 2014
$834k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086703NIH HHS S10 OD018516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sirtuin inhibitors have attracted much interest due to the involvement of sirtuins in various biological processes. Several SIRT2-selective inhibitors have been developed, and some exhibit anticancer activities. To facilitate the choice of inhibitors in future studies and the development of better inhibitors, we directly compared several reported SIRT2-selective inhibitors: AGK2, SirReal2, Tenovin-6, and TM. In vitro, TM is the most potent and selective inhibitor, and only TM could inhibit the demyristoylation activity of SIRT2. SirReal2, Tenovin-6, and TM all showed cytotoxicity in cancer cell lines, with Tenovin-6 being the most potent, but only TM showed cancer-cell-specific toxicity. All four compounds inhibited the anchorage-independent growth of HCT116 cells, but the effect of TM was most significantly affected by SIRT2 overexpression, suggesting that the anticancer effect of TM depends more on SIRT2 inhibition. These results not only provide useful guidance about choosing the right SIRT2 inhibitor in future studies, but also suggest general practices that should be followed for small-molecule inhibitor development activities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHCT116 CellsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMolecular StructureSirtuin 2Structure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsSIRT2 protein, humanSirtuin 2cancercytotoxicityinhibitorsSIRT2sirtuins

Identifiers

PMID30058233
PMCPMC6402572
OpenAlexW2886801180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.