Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30058158›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018

Case-specific non-linear finite element models to predict failure behavior in two functional spinal units.

Karlijn H J Groenen, Thom Bitter, Tristia C G van Veluwen, Yvette M van der Linden, Nico Verdonschot, Esther Tanck, Dennis Janssen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Geometric determinants of the mechanical behavior of image-based finite element models of the intervertebral disc.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  14. Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karlijn H J GroenenOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2055-2665
Thom BitterOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tristia C G van VeluwenOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yvette M van der LindenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nico VerdonschotOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther TanckOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dennis JanssenOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current finite element (FE) models predicting failure behavior comprise single vertebrae, thereby neglecting the role of the posterior elements and intervertebral discs. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a more clinically relevant, case-specific non-linear FE model of two functional spinal units able to predict failure behavior in terms of (i) the vertebra predicted to fail; (ii) deformation of the specimens; (iii) stiffness; and (iv) load to failure. For this purpose, we also studied the effect of different bone density-mechanical properties relationships (material models) on the prediction of failure behavior. Twelve two functional spinal units (T6-T8, T9-T11, T12-L2, and L3-L5) with and without artificial metastases were destructively tested in axial compression. These experiments were simulated using CT-based case-specific non-linear FE models. Bone mechanical properties were assigned using four commonly used material models. In 10 of the 11 specimens our FE model was able to correctly indicate which vertebrae failed during the experiments. However, predictions of the three-dimensional deformations of the specimens were less promising. Whereas stiffness of the whole construct could be strongly predicted (R

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscMaleSpinal FracturesTomography, X-Ray Computedbone metastasesfailure behaviorfinite element modelsfracture predictionquantitative computed tomographyspine

Identifiers

PMID30058158
PMCPMC6585652
OpenAlexW2887290155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.