Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30058112›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2018

Characterization and Changes of Lymphocyte Subsets in Baricitinib-Treated Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Integrated Analysis.

Yoshiya Tanaka, Iain B McInnes, Peter C Taylor, Nicole L Byers, Lei Chen, Stephanie de Bono, Maher Issa, William L Macias, Veronica Rogai, Terence P Rooney and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Severe COVID-19: Drugs and Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Binary Classification of Protein Kinases.Journal of inflammation research · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yoshiya TanakaUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Iain B McInnesUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre and University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicole L ByersEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Lei ChenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Stephanie de BonoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Maher IssaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
William L MaciasEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Veronica RogaiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Terence P RooneyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Douglas E SchlichtingEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Steven H ZuckermanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Paul EmeryNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBaricitinib is an orally administered inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 that has been shown to be effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was undertaken to analyze changes in lymphocyte cell subsets during baricitinib treatment and to correlate these changes with clinical outcomes.

methodsAn integrated analysis was conducted by pooling data from 3 completed phase III trials comparing placebo with baricitinib treatment (RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, and RA-BEACON) and 1 ongoing long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) in patients with active RA (n = 2,186).

resultsBaricitinib treatment was associated with an early transient increase in total lymphocyte count at week 4, which returned to baseline by week 12. Transient changes within normal reference ranges in T cells and subsets were observed with baricitinib treatment, up to week 104. B cells and relevant subpopulations increased after 4 weeks of baricitinib treatment, with no further increases noted through 104 weeks of treatment. Natural killer (NK) cells temporarily increased after 4 weeks of baricitinib treatment, before decreasing below baseline levels and then stabilizing over time. With baricitinib treatment, few correlations were observed between changes in lymphocyte subsets and clinical end points, and most correlations were also observed within the placebo group. A modest potential association between low NK cell numbers and treatment-emergent infections was observed in the baricitinib 4 mg/day treatment group, but not for serious infections or herpes zoster.

conclusionOverall, these findings demonstrate that changes in lymphocyte subsets were largely within normal reference ranges across the baricitinib phase III RA clinical program and were not associated with increased risk of serious infections.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAzetidinesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocyte SubsetsMaleMiddle AgedPurinesPyrazolesAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesbaricitinibPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID30058112
PMCPMC6587754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.