Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057959›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2018

PROGRESS: the PROMISE governance framework to decrease coercion in mental healthcare.

Chiara Lombardo, Tine Van Bortel, Adam P Wagner, Emma Kaminskiy, Ceri Wilson, Theeba Krishnamoorthy, Sarah Rae, Lorna Rouse, Peter Brian Jones, Manaan Kar Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiara LombardoCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Tine Van Bortel *Institute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK.
Adam P Wagner *National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England, Cambridge, UK.
Emma KaminskiyDepartment of Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Ceri WilsonFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Department of Adult and Mental Health Nursing, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
Theeba KrishnamoorthyInstitute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK.
Sarah RaeCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Lorna RouseFaculty of Wellbeing, Education & Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Peter Brian JonesNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England, Cambridge, UK.
Manaan Kar RayCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing physical intervention in mental health inpatient care is a global priority. It is extremely distressing both to patients and staff. PROactive Management of Integrated Services and Environments (PROMISE) was developed within Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) to bring about culture change to decrease coercion in care. This study evaluates the changes in physical intervention numbers and patient experience metrics and proposes an easy-to-adopt and adapt governance framework for complex interventions. PROMISE was based on three core values of: providing a caring response to all distress; courage to challenge the status quo; and coproduction of novel solutions. It sought to transform daily front-line interactions related to risk-based restrictive practice that often leads to physical interventions. PROactive Governance of Recovery Settings and Services, a five-step governance framework (Report, Reflect, Review, Rethink and Refresh), was developed in an iterative and organic fashion to oversee the improvement journey and effectively translate information into knowledge, learning and actions. Overall physical interventions reduced from 328 to 241and210 across consecutive years (2014, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, respectively). Indeed, the 2016-2017 total would have been further reduced to 126 were it not for the perceived substantial care needs of one patient. Prone restraints reduced from 82 to 32 (2015-2016 and 2016-2017, respectively). During 2016-2017, each ward had a continuous 3-month period of no restraints and 4 months without prone restrains. Patient experience surveys (n=4591) for 2014-2017 rated overall satisfaction with care at 87%. CPFT reported fewer physical interventions and maintained high patient experience scores when using a five-pronged governance approach. It has a summative function to define where a team or an organisation is relative to goals and is formative in setting up the next steps relating to action, learning and future planning.

Indexed as

governancemental healthpatient safetypatient satisfactionquality improvement methodologies

Identifiers

PMID30057959
PMCPMC6059331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.