Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057943›Full record

ArticlemSystems

Responses of the Human Gut

Taylor K S Richter, Jane M Michalski, Luke Zanetti, Sharon M Tennant, Wilbur H Chen, David A Rasko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk Factors Associated with Shiga-toxinInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid turnover and short-term blooms ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  7. Viroid-like colonists of human microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. EcoSal Plus · 2020
    Review
  20. Factors Obscuring the Role ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taylor K S RichterDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jane M MichalskiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Luke ZanettiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sharon M TennantCenter for Vaccine Development, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Wilbur H ChenCenter for Vaccine Development, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-5536
David A RaskoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-7154

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI110820 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARNEIRO DA SILVA, JOANA · 2014 to 2023
$36.5M
Research Training in Gastroenterology and HepatologyT32DK067872 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI RAUFMAN, JEAN-PIERRE · 2005 to 2024
$7.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110820NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK067872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of Escherichia coli in the human gastrointestinal tract have focused on pathogens, such as diarrhea-causing enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), while overlooking the resident, nonpathogenic E. coli community. Relatively few genomes of nonpathogenic E. coli strains are available for comparative genomic analysis, and the ecology of these strains is poorly understood. This study examined the diversity and dynamics of resident human gastrointestinal E. coli communities in the face of the ecological challenges presented by pathogen (ETEC) challenge, as well as of antibiotic treatment. Whole-genome sequences obtained from E. coli isolates from before, during, and after ETEC challenge were used in phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses to examine the diversity of the resident E. coli communities, as well as the dynamics of the challenge strain, H10407, a well-studied ETEC strain (serotype O78:H11) that produces both heat-labile and heat-stable enterotoxins. ETEC failed to become the dominant E. coli clone in two of the six challenge subjects, each of whom exhibited limited or no clinical presentation of diarrhea. The E. coli communities of the remaining four subjects became ETEC dominant during the challenge but reverted to their original, subject-specific populations following antibiotic treatment, suggesting resiliency of the resident E. coli population following major ecological disruptions. This resiliency is likely due in part to the abundance of antibiotic-resistant ST131 E. coli strains in the resident populations. This report provides valuable insights into the potential interactions of members of the gastrointestinal microbiome and its responses to challenge by an external pathogen and by antibiotic exposure.

Indexed as

Escherichia colihuman challengeresident E. colivariation

Identifiers

PMID30057943
PMCPMC6060285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.