Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2018

Combined ATR and DNA-PK Inhibition Radiosensitizes Tumor Cells Independently of Their p53 Status.

Hind Hafsi, Magnus T Dillon, Holly E Barker, Joan N Kyula, Ulrike Schick, James T Paget, Henry G Smith, Malin Pedersen, Martin McLaughlin, Kevin J Harrington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genotype-Directed Synthetic Cytotoxicity of ATR Inhibition with Radiotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Targeting DNA-PK.Cancer treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hind HafsiDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Magnus T DillonDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Holly E BarkerDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Joan N KyulaDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Ulrike SchickDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
James T PagetDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Henry G SmithDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Malin PedersenDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Martin McLaughlinDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Kevin J HarringtonDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17796Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a significant cause of cancer deaths. Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is a standard of care for locally advanced disease. ATR and DNA-PK inhibition (DNA-PKi) are actively being investigated in clinical trials with preclinical data supporting clinical translation as radiosensitizers. Here, we hypothesized that targeting both ATR and DNA-PK with small molecule inhibitors would increase radiosensitization of HNSCC cell lines. Radiosensitization was assessed by Bliss independence analysis of colony survival data. Strong cell cycle perturbing effects were observed with ATR inhibition reversing the G2/M arrest observed for radiation-DNA-PKi. Increased apoptosis in combination groups was measured by Sub-G1 DNA populations. DNA-PKi increased radiation-induced RAD51 and gamma-H2Ax foci, with the addition of ATR inhibition reducing levels of both. A sharp increase in nuclear fragmentation after aberrant mitotic transit appears to be the main driver of decreased survival due to irradiation and dual ATR/DNA-PKi. Dual inhibition of DNA-PK and ATR represents a novel approach in combination with radiation, with efficacy appearing to be independent of p53 status. Due to toxicity concerns, careful assessment is necessary in any future translation of single or dual radiosensitization approaches. Ongoing clinical trials into the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 plus radiation, and the phenotypically similar combination of AZD6738 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib, are likely to be key in ascertaining the toxicity profile of such combinations.

Indexed as

ataxia telangiectasia- and RAD3-relatedcheckpoint abrogationDNA damage responsemitotic catastropheradiosensitization

Identifiers

PMID30057890
PMCPMC6053502
OpenAlexW2808784973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.