Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057864›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2018

Correlated Regression Feature Learning for Automated Right Ventricle Segmentation.

Jun Chen, Heye Zhang, Weiwei Zhang, Xiuquan Du, Yanping Zhang, Shuo Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun ChenSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyAnhui UniversityHefei230601China.
Heye ZhangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of SciencesShenzhen518055China.
Weiwei ZhangSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyAnhui UniversityHefei230601China.
Xiuquan DuSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyAnhui UniversityHefei230601China.
Yanping ZhangSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyAnhui UniversityHefei230601China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Medical ImagingWestern UniversityLondonONN6A 3K7Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of right ventricle (RV) from cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images can help a doctor to robustly quantify the clinical indices including ejection fraction. In this paper, we develop one regression convolutional neural network (RegressionCNN) which combines a holistic regression model and a convolutional neural network (CNN) together to determine boundary points' coordinates of RV directly and simultaneously. In our approach, we take the fully connected layers of CNN as the holistic regression model to perform RV segmentation, and the feature maps extracted by convolutional layers of CNN are converted into 1-D vector to connect holistic regression model. Such connection allows us to make full use of the optimization algorithm to constantly optimize the convolutional layers to directly learn the holistic regression model in the training process rather than separate feature extraction and regression model learning. Therefore, RegressionCNN can achieve optimally convolutional feature learning for accurately catching the regression features that are more correlated to RV regression segmentation task in training process, and this can reduce the latent mismatch influence between the feature extraction and the following regression model learning. We evaluate the performance of RegressionCNN on cardiac MR images acquired of 145 human subjects from two clinical centers. The results have shown that RegressionCNN's results are highly correlated (average boundary correlation coefficient equals 0.9827) and consistent with the manual delineation (average dice metric equals 0.8351). Hence, RegressionCNN could be an effective way to segment RV from cardiac MR images accurately and automatically.

Indexed as

boundary pointsCNNRegressionCNNregression segmentationRV segmentation

Identifiers

PMID30057864
PMCPMC6061487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.