Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057863›Full record

ArticleExpert opinion on orphan drugs2018

Gene therapy for the treatment of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Cristina Martinez-Fernandez De La Camara, Anika Nanda, Anna Paola Salvetti, M Dominik Fischer, Robert E MacLaren

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert opinion on orphan drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic medicine and personalized treatment: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina Martinez-Fernandez De La CamaraNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Anika NandaNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Anna Paola SalvettiNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
M Dominik FischerNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSTZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K003690/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionX-linked retinitis pigmentosa caused by mutations in the AREAS COVERED: This manuscript reviews the natural history of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and the research performed from the discovery of the causative gene, EXPERT OPINION: X-linked retinitis pigmentosa is an amenable disease to be treated by gene therapy. Codon optimisation has overcome the challenge of designing an

Indexed as

Adeno-associated viruscodon optimisationgene therapyretinitis pigmentosaretinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)

Identifiers

PMID30057863
PMCPMC6059358
OpenAlexW2789372388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.