Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057721›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2018

The clinical outcome of the different HemiCAP and UniCAP knee implants: A systematic and comprehensive review.

Michael-Alexander Malahias, Dimitrios Chytas, Fritz Thorey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surface texture analysis of different focal knee resurfacing implants after 6 and 12 months in vivo in a goat model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What future in the treatment of osteochondral knee defects?Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael-Alexander MalahiasATOS Hospital Heidelberg, International Center for Hip, Knee and Foot Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dimitrios ChytasNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 2 Orthopedic Department, Athens, Greece.
Fritz ThoreyATOS Hospital Heidelberg, International Center for Hip, Knee and Foot Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focal metallic cartilage resurfacing is a surgical method that offers an appropriate

Indexed as

hemicapinlay designknee focal metallic implantunicapWave prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID30057721
PMCPMC6042054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.