ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2018
Microhardness and shear bond-strength of carious dentin after fluorescence-aided or conventionally excavation: (An
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Dentin-Disinfection Chemicals on Shear Bond Strength and Microhardness of Resin-Infiltrated Human Dentin in Different Adhesive Protocols.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Trial
- Advanced Lasers and Their Applications in Dentistry.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Does the heat generated by fluorescence-aided caries excavation system effect the pulp temperature of primary teeth irreversibly? AnJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021Article
- Chemo-mechanical characterization of carious dentine using Raman microscopy and Knoop microhardness.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the fluorescence-aided and conventionally excavated dentin with microhardness and shear bond strength(SBS) tests. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty-four teeth with dentin caries were bisected through the center of the lesion into two halves. Forty-eight dentin specimens were embedded and mounted in an acrylic resin. All carious tissue was removed and classified as caries free using conventional visual tactile criteria. Then half of the specimens(n=24) were reinspected with fluorescence-aided caries excavation light(FACE) (FaceLight, W&H Dentalwerk, Bürmoos GmbH, Austria). Specimens were subjected to microhardness and shear bond strength testings. The fracture mode analysis was also performed. The data were compared with Student's t test and Chi-square test.
resultsResidual caries was observed in 2 out of 24 conventionally excavated specimens with FACE inspection(
conclusionsFACE method could be considered as a promising technique for removing infected dentin.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.