ArticleOncology reviews2018
Cancer oriented biobanks: A comprehensive review.
Article in Oncology reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Biobanking: IoT, safety challenges and security prospects.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Review
- Lung cancer biobanking in Australia: challenges and future directions.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Protein inhibitor of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 is an oncoprotein in oral squamous cell carcinoma and related to cigarette smoking - An in vitro study.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Perception of Polish patients with cancer of the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Beijing Children's Hospital guidelines on the design and conduction of the first standardized database for medulloblastoma.Metabolic brain disease · 2023Article
- Revolutionizing Cancer Research: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Biobanking.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical Network Systems Biology: Traversing the Cancer Multiverse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Banking on a new understanding: translational opportunities from veterinary biobanks.GeroScience · 2023Review
- Article
- Modelling Genetic Benefits and Financial Costs of Integrating Biobanking into the Captive Management of Koalas.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Laying the groundwork for the Biobank of Rare Malignant Neoplasms at the service of the Hellenic Network of Precision Medicine on Cancer.International journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Contemporary Management of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Views from the PelvEx Collaborative.Cancers · 2022Review
- Progressing Towards a Human-Centric Approach in Cancer Research.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The landscape of biobanks in Poland-characteristics of Polish biobanking units at the beginning of BBMRI.pl organization.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Utilizing a large-scale biobanking registry to assess patient priorities and preferences for cancer research and education.PloS one · 2021Article
- Biobanking in the digital pathology era.Oncology research · 2021Article
- Virtual Biobanking for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) Initiative.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- The Significance of Biobanking in the Sustainability of Biomedical Research: A Review.Iranian biomedical journal · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biobanks provide a platform for innovative biomedical research and has improvised translational and personalized medicine to a great extent. Time 2009 published
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.