Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057632›Full record

ArticleJournal of research practice2018

Conducting a Large Public Health Data Collection Project in Uganda: Methods, Tools, and Lessons Learned.

Bert Stover, Flavia Lubega, Aidah Namubiru, Evelyn Bakengesa, Samuel Abimerech Luboga, Frederick Makumbi, Noah Kiwanuka, Assay Ndizihiwe, Eddie Mukooyo, Erin Hurley and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bert StoverSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.
Flavia LubegaCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Aidah NamubiruCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Evelyn BakengesaCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Samuel Abimerech LubogaCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Frederick MakumbiCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Noah KiwanukaCollege of Health Science, Makerere University, Kampala, UGANDA.
Assay NdizihiweCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Entebbe, UGANDA.
Eddie MukooyoThe Resource Centre, Ministry of Health, UGANDA.
Erin HurleyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES.
Travis LimCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES.
Nagesh N BorseCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES.
James BernhardtSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.
Angela WoodSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.
Lianne SheppardSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.
Scott BarnhartSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.
Amy HagopianSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, UNITED STATES.

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001911 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HARRIS, JEFFREY RANDALL · 2009 to 2013
$14.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the implementation experience of carrying out data collection and other activities for a public health evaluation study on whether U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) investment improved utilization of health services and health system strengthening in Uganda. The retrospective study period focused on the PEPFAR scale-up, from mid-2005 through mid-2011, a period of expansion of PEPFAR programing and health services. We visited 315 health care facilities in Uganda in 2011 and 2012 to collect routine health management information system data forms, as well as to conduct interviews with health system leaders. An earlier phase of this research project collected data from all 112 health district headquarters, reported elsewhere. This article describes the lessons learned from collecting data from health care facilities, project management, useful technologies, and mistakes. We used several new technologies to facilitate data collection, including portable document scanners, smartphones, and web-based data collection, along with older but reliable technologies such as car batteries for power, folding tables to create space, and letters of introduction from appropriate authorities to create entrée. Research in limited-resource settings requires an approach that values the skills and talents of local people, institutions and government agencies, and a tolerance for the unexpected. The development of personal relationships was key to the success of the project. We observed that capacity building activities were repaid many fold, especially in data management and technology.

Indexed as

data collection methodhealth services researchhealth system strengtheninglimited-resource settingproject managementpublic health evaluationresearch contextresearch implementationresearch partnership

Identifiers

PMID30057632
PMCPMC6058317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.