Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057509›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2018

Constructing an Inexpensive Elevated Plus Maze.

Grant A Fox, Eugene Torigoe, Greg Q Butcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Behavioral Effects of Oral Psychostimulant Ingestion on a Laboratory Rat Sample: An Undergraduate Research Experience.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grant A FoxDepartment of Neuroscience, Thiel College, Greenville, PA 16125.
Eugene TorigoeDepartment of Physics, Thiel College, Greenville, PA 16125.
Greg Q ButcherDepartment of Neuroscience, Thiel College, Greenville, PA 16125.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing students to the challenges and rewards of legitimate experimentation has become an essential part of many undergraduate lab courses. However, this objective can be difficult to achieve if the students find the topic uninteresting and therefore do not take ownership of the project. Additionally, the budgets of most undergraduate courses do not allow for the purchase of new equipment for student-generated projects. Here we describe a lab project where students engaged in the process of designing and building their own inexpensive apparatus. Driven by their interest in anxiety research, students in a Neuroscience Methods course developed the following protocol to build an elevated plus maze (EPM) and optional data acquisition module, for less than $100 each. The project engaged students in work that required applied critical thinking and real-world problem solving, and produced a functional EPM that was used in multiple projects beyond this course.

Indexed as

anxietyArduinobehavioral testingcritical thinkingelevated plus maze (EPM)

Identifiers

PMID30057509
PMCPMC6057757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.