Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057405›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Transcription factors WT1 and p53 combined: a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer.

Julia H Carter, James A Deddens, Gretchen Mueller, Thomas G Lewis, Mariah K Dooley, Michelle C Robillard, Molly Frydl, Lydia Duvall, Jackson O Pemberton, Larry E Douglass

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers of Ovarian Carcinosarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Extracts ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Nucleic acid vaccination strategies for ovarian cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Ethanol Extracts ofJournal of immunology research · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic Significance of Increased Expression of Annexin A10 (ANXA10) in Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia H CarterWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA. jcarter@woodhudson.org.
James A DeddensDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45202, USA.
Gretchen MuellerWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Thomas G LewisWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Mariah K DooleyWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Michelle C RobillardWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Molly FrydlWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Lydia DuvallWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Jackson O PembertonSt. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, KY, 41018, USA.
Larry E DouglassWood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Wood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory · USSt. Elizabeth Healthcare · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew approaches to ovarian cancer are needed to improve survival. Wilms' tumour 1 (WT1) is a tumour-associated antigen expressed in many ovarian cancers. P53 is also often altered. The clinical significance of the combined expression of these two transcription factors has not been studied.

methodsOne hundred ninety-six ovarian tumours were classified histopathologically. Tumours were stained for WT1 and p53 immunohistochemically. Stains were analysed according to tumour type, grade and FIGO stage. Kaplan-Meier analyses on 96 invasive carcinomas determined whether categorical variables were related to survival.

resultsWT1 and p53 were related to ovarian tumour type, grade, FIGO stage and patient survival. Uniform nuclear p53 expression was associated with invasion and WT1 expression was associated with advanced grade, FIGO stage and poor survival. When WT1 and p53 were both in the age-adjusted Cox model, WT1 was significant while p53 was not. When we combined tumours expressing WT1 and p53, then adjusted for age and tumour subtype, the hazard ratio compared to tumours without WT1 and with normal p53 was 2.70; when adjusted for age and FIGO stage, the hazard ratio was 2.40.

conclusionsWT1, an antigen target, is a biomarker for poor prognosis, particularly when combined with altered p53.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationAgedAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCell NucleusFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53WT1 protein, humanWT1 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30057405
PMCPMC6134086
OpenAlexW2884452328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.