Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057309›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Discovery of a New Song Mode in Drosophila Reveals Hidden Structure in the Sensory and Neural Drivers of Behavior.

Jan Clemens, Philip Coen, Frederic A Roemschied, Talmo D Pereira, David Mazumder, Diego E Aldarondo, Diego A Pacheco, Mala Murthy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncovering Sex Differences in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole-body 3D kinematics of freely behavingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sequencing of distinct wing behaviors duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neurons Underlying Aggression-Like Actions That Are Shared by Both Males and Females inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Male-male interactions shape mate selection inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan ClemensPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Philip CoenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Frederic A RoemschiedPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Talmo D PereiraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
David MazumderPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Diego E AldarondoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Diego A PachecoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mala MurthyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. Electronic address: mmurthy@princeton.edu.
Princeton University · US

Funding

How does the brain solve the pattern recognition problem?DP2NS092378 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, MALA · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS092378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering how brains generate behavior depends critically on an accurate description of behavior. If distinct behaviors are lumped together, separate modes of brain activity can be wrongly attributed to the same behavior. Alternatively, if a single behavior is split into two, the same neural activity can appear to produce different behaviors. Here, we address this issue in the context of acoustic communication in Drosophila. During courtship, males vibrate their wings to generate time-varying songs, and females evaluate songs to inform mating decisions. For 50 years, Drosophila melanogaster song was thought to consist of only two modes, sine and pulse, but using unsupervised classification methods on large datasets of song recordings, we now establish the existence of at least three song modes: two distinct pulse types, along with a single sine mode. We show how this seemingly subtle distinction affects our interpretation of the mechanisms underlying song production and perception. Specifically, we show that visual feedback influences the probability of producing each song mode and that male song mode choice affects female responses and contributes to modulating his song amplitude with distance. At the neural level, we demonstrate how the activity of four separate neuron types within the fly's song pathway differentially affects the probability of producing each song mode. Our results highlight the importance of carefully segmenting behavior to map the underlying sensory, neural, and genetic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterMotor NeuronsSexual Behavior, Animalacoustic communicationbehaviorcourtship songDrosophilaneural circuits

Identifiers

PMID30057309
PMCPMC6830513
OpenAlexW2780633367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.