Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057104›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018

Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial.

Janusz A Z Jankowski, John de Caestecker, Sharon B Love, Gavin Reilly, Peter Watson, Scott Sanders, Yeng Ang, Danielle Morris, Pradeep Bhandari, Claire Brooks and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00357682 (A Phase III, Randomized, Study of Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett's Metaplasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00357682 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Study of Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett's Metaplasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2005 to 2017Enrolled2,557ConditionsEsophageal Cancer, Precancerous ConditionArmsEsomeprazole, Aspirin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemoprevention of Barrett's Esophagus: a Systematic Review and Comprehensive Assessment of Bias.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. AGA Clinical Practice Update on New Technology and Innovation for Surveillance and Screening in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline on screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  8. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Gastrin/CCKCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Esophageal cancer: from pathogenesis to precision therapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus: Evolving and Emerging Mechanisms.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  17. Barrett's esophagus: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Carcinoma of Esophagus.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Janusz A Z JankowskiGastroenterology Unit, Morecambe Bay University Hospitals NHS Trust, Lancaster, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK. Electronic address: janusz.jankowski@nice.org.uk.
John de CaesteckerDigestive Diseases Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK; College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sharon B LoveCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Gavin ReillyCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter WatsonQueens University, Belfast, UK.
Scott SandersSouth Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, UK.
Yeng AngWrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK; GI Science, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Danielle MorrisQueen Elizabeth II Hospital, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Pradeep BhandariQueen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Claire BrooksOncology Clinical Trials Office, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen AttwoodSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Rebecca HarrisonDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Hugh BarrGloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Paul MoayyediDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University Ontario, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
AspECT Trial Team
Durham University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBGloucestershire Royal Hospital · GBMcMaster University · CAQueen Alexandra Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth II Hospital · GBSouth Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust · GBWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16895Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOesophageal adenocarcinoma is the sixth most common cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett's oesophagus is the biggest risk factor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and aspirin for improving outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

methodsThe Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett's metaplasia Trial had a 2 × 2 factorial design and was done at 84 centres in the UK and one in Canada. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus of 1 cm or more were randomised 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit to receive high-dose (40 mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20 mg once-daily) PPI, with or without aspirin (300 mg per day in the UK, 325 mg per day in Canada) for at least 8 years, in an unblinded manner. Reporting pathologists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, or high-grade dysplasia, which was analysed with accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimisation factors (age, Barrett's oesophagus length, intestinal metaplasia) in all patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2004-003836-77.

findingsBetween March 10, 2005, and March 1, 2009, 2557 patients were recruited. 705 patients were assigned to low-dose PPI and no aspirin, 704 to high-dose PPI and no aspirin, 571 to low-dose PPI and aspirin, and 577 to high-dose PPI and aspirin. Median follow-up and treatment duration was 8·9 years (IQR 8·2-9·8), and we collected 20 095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. 313 primary events occurred. High-dose PPI (139 events in 1270 patients) was superior to low-dose PPI (174 events in 1265 patients; time ratio [TR] 1·27, 95% CI 1·01-1·58, p=0·038). Aspirin (127 events in 1138 patients) was not significantly better than no aspirin (154 events in 1142 patients; TR 1·24, 0·98-1·57, p=0·068). If patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were censored at the time of first use, aspirin was significantly better than no aspirin (TR 1·29, 1·01-1·66, p=0·043; n=2236). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low-dose PPI without aspirin (TR 1·59, 1·14-2·23, p=0·0068). The numbers needed to treat were 34 for PPI and 43 for aspirin. Only 28 (1%) participants reported study-treatment-related serious adverse events.

interpretationHigh-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improved outcomes in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

fundingCancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, Wellcome Trust, and Health Technology Assessment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinBarrett EsophagusDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEsomeprazoleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProton Pump InhibitorsYoung AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinEsomeprazoleProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30057104
PMCPMC6083438
OpenAlexW2883616947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.