Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30056599›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018

Older melanoma patients aged 75 and above retain responsiveness to anti-PD1 therapy: results of a retrospective single-institution cohort study.

Tony Ibrahim, Christine Mateus, Maria Baz, Caroline Robert

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the Elderly.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Aging, cancer, and antitumor immunity.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tony IbrahimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institut, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France. tony.ibrahim@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-8554
Christine MateusDermatology Department, Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, France.
Maria BazFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Caroline RobertDermatology Department, Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, France.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRSaint Joseph University · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe utility of immunotherapy in elderly melanoma patients is debated. We aimed in this study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of immunotherapy among elderly patients.

methodThis is a retrospective single-institution cohort study. Patients aged 75 years and above who had been treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or ipilimumab for advanced or metastatic melanoma, were included. Patients and disease characteristics were collected using electronic medical records. Objective response was determined according to the immune-related response criteria. Drug-related toxicities (DRT) were graded according to the CTCAE v4.03.

results99 patients were included with a mean age of 80 years (SD = 4). One patient received nivolumab and ipilimumab combination, but died because of drug-related diverticulitis. Median PFS on pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab were equal to 11.9 (95% CI 5.4-18.4), 1.4 (95% CI 0.01-2.8), and 2.8 months (95% CI 2.6-3), respectively, while objective response rates were equal to 51.6, 12.5, and 17.3%, respectively. Median OS was not reached in patients who received only pembrolizumab, 8.7 months in the ipilimumab only group, and 23 months in patients receiving several immune therapies sequentially. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab grade 3-4 DRT rates were equal to 24.2, 62.5, and 32.7% respectively, while discontinuation rates were equal to 43.5, 62.5, and 28.8%, respectively.

conclusionsOur study suggests that immunotherapy is effective and well tolerated in the elderly. The PFS on pembrolizumab was greater than expected, a finding that needs to be investigated further.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaNivolumabPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalIpilimumabNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnti-CTLA4Anti-PD1ElderlyImmunotherapyMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID30056599
PMCPMC11028036
OpenAlexW2883070482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.