Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30056580›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of hematology2018

A comparison of qPCR and ddPCR used for quantification of the JAK2 V617F allele burden in Ph negative MPNs.

Dorota Link-Lenczowska, Niels Pallisgaard, Sabrina Cordua, Magdalena Zawada, Sylwia Czekalska, Dorota Krochmalczyk, Zuzanna Kanduła, Tomasz Sacha

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection ofBiomolecules · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Research progress on circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease in solid tumors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorota Link-LenczowskaDepartment of Hematology Diagnostics, The University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Niels PallisgaardDepartment of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Sabrina CorduaDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Magdalena ZawadaDepartment of Hematology Diagnostics, The University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Sylwia CzekalskaDepartment of Hematology Diagnostics, The University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Dorota KrochmalczykChair of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 17, 31-501, Krakow, Poland.
Zuzanna KandułaDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz SachaChair of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 17, 31-501, Krakow, Poland. sachatom@gmail.com.
Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute · PLJagiellonian University · PLZealand University Hospital · DKPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a diverse group of diseases whose common feature is the presence of V617F mutation of the JAK2 gene. In the era of novel therapeutic strategies in MPNs, such as JAK-inhibitor therapy, there is a growing need for establishing high sensitive quantitative methods, which can be useful not only at diagnosis but also for monitoring therapeutic outcomes, such as minimal residual disease (MRD). In this study, we compared the qPCR and ddPCR methods and their clinical utility for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment monitoring of MPNs with JAK2 V617F mutation in 63 MPN patients of which 6 were subjected to ruxolitinib treatment. We show a high conformance between the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.998 (p < 0.0001)). Our experiments revealed high analytical sensitivity for both tests, suggesting that they are capable of detecting the JAK2 V617F mutation at diagnosis of MPN with a limit of detection (LoD) of 0.12% for qPCR and 0.01% for ddPCR. The alterations of JAK2 V617F allele burden in patients treated with ruxolitinib were measured by both methods with equal accuracy. The results suggest an advantage of ddPCR in monitoring MRD because of allele burdens below the LoD of qPCR. Overall, the clinical utility of qPCR and ddPCR is very high, and both methods could be recommended for the routine detection of the V617F mutation at diagnosis, though ddPCR will probably supersede qPCR in the future due to cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

AllelesMutation, MissensePhiladelphia ChromosomeAdultAgedAmino Acid SubstitutionFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansJanus Kinase 2MaleMiddle AgedMyeloproliferative DisordersReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRituximabJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2RituximabddPCRJAK-inhibitorLimit of detectionMinimal residual diseaseMyeloproliferative neoplasmsqPCR

Identifiers

PMID30056580
PMCPMC6208664
OpenAlexW2884887484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.