ArticleJournal of neurology2018
Cerebellum and cognition in progressive MS patients: functional changes beyond atrophy?
Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- MR Imaging Signs of Gadolinium Retention Are Not Associated with Long-Term Motor and Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Cerebellar pathology in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: current status and future directions.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2023Review
- Disability outcomes in early-stage African American and White people with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients : Review.Clinical neuroradiology · 2022Review
- Regional Cerebellar Volume Loss Predicts Future Disability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Article
- Relation of sensorimotor and cognitive cerebellum functional connectivity with brain structural damage in patients with multiple sclerosis and no disability.European journal of neurology · 2022Article
- The cerebellum and its network: Disrupted static and dynamic functional connectivity patterns and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2021Article
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Structural and Functional Connectivity Substrates of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Editorial: The Cerebellum: From Vascular Disease to Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- The Relationship Between Zebrin Expression and Cerebellar Functions: Insights From Neuroimaging Studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- A Comprehensive Approach to Disentangle the Effect of Cerebellar Damage on Physical Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cerebellum is a predilection site of pathology in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) patients, contributing to cognitive deficits. Aim of this study was to investigate lobular cerebellar functional connectivity (FC) in PMS patients in relation to cognition.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, resting state fMRI analysis was carried out on 29 PMS patients (11 males, mean age 51.2 ± 11.9 years) and 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) (11 males, mean age 49.6 ± 8.8 years). Data were analyzed with a seed-based approach, with four different seeds placed at the level of cerebellar Lobule VI, Crus I, Crus II and Lobule VIIb, accounting for cerebellar structural damage. Cognitive status was assessed with the BICAMS battery. Correlations between fMRI data and clinical variables were probed with the Spearman correlation coefficient.
resultsWhen testing FC differences between PMS and HC without taking into account cerebellar structural damage, PMS patients showed a reduction of FC between Crus II/Lobule VIIb and the right frontal pole (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), with an increased FC between Lobule VIIb and the right precentral gyrus (p < 0.001). After controlling for structural damage, PMS patients still showed a reduced FC between Crus II and right frontal pole (p = 0.005), as well as an increased FC between Lobule VIIb and right precentral gyrus (p = 0.003), with the latter showing an inverse correlation with BVMT scores (r = - 0.393; p = 0.03).
conclusionPMS patients show cerebellar FC rearrangements that are partially independent from cerebellar structural damage, and are likely expression of a maladaptive functional rewiring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30056570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.