Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30056549›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Comparison of the tissue response of selective retina therapy with or without real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry.

Kim Minhee, Young-Gun Park, Seungbum Kang, Young Jung Roh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retinal pigment epithelial responses based on the irradiation density of selective retina therapy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim MinheeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 10, 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07345, South Korea.
Young-Gun ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 10, 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07345, South Korea.
Seungbum KangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Young Jung RohDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 10, 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07345, South Korea. youngjungroh@hanmail.net.
The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy M000004912-00192937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the retinal tissue response upon selective retina therapy (SRT) with or without real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry (RFD) in rabbits.

methodsEighteen eyes of nine Chinchilla Bastard rabbits were treated by SRT with or without RFD (Q-switched Nd:YLF, wavelength 527 nm, pulse duration 1.7 μs). RFD operated by optoacoustic and reflectometric methods detects the microbubbles from retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) damage in real time. After SRT, light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed at 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, and 1 month. The RPE-damaged area on SEM was measured by ImageJ 1 h after SRT.

resultsWithout RFD, the RPE-damaged area of 76 SRT-treated spots showed a strong positive correlation with ramping pulse energy (Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.706; P < 0.001). With RFD, there was a weak positive correlation between the RPE-damaged area of 92 spots and ramping pulse energy (Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.211; P = 0.044). The detection rate of RFD was 91.8% by evaluating 563 SRT spots. Histology revealed that SRT with RFD produced a selectively disrupted RPE monolayer while sparing the photoreceptor layer inner segment.

conclusionsRFD can be useful to titrate the pulse energy of visually undetectable SRT treatment.

Indexed as

FeedbackAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiLaser CoagulationLasers, Solid-StateOphthalmoscopyRabbitsRetinal DiseasesRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTomography, Optical CoherenceReal-time feedback-controlled dosimetry (RFD)Retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE)Selective retina therapy (SRT)

Identifiers

PMID30056549
OpenAlexW2883729747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.