Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30056522›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019

Endothelial cell density changes in diabetic and nondiabetic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique.

Erika Fernández-Muñoz, Rocío Zamora-Ortiz, Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04965168 (Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04965168 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled61ConditionsPseudoexfoliationArmsphacoemulsification of the lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika Fernández-MuñozAnterior Segment Surgery Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rocío Zamora-OrtizAnterior Segment Surgery Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Gonzalez-SalinasResearch Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera, Vicente García Torres 46, Barrio San Lucas, Coyoacán, CP 04030, Mexico City, Mexico. dr.gonzalezsalinas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-5191
Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera en México Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess endothelial cell density (ECD) changes on diabetic and nondiabetic patients after phacoemulsification surgery employing the phaco-chop technique.

methodsThis is a prospective, experimental and comparative study. We included type-two diabetic (T2DM) patients and nondiabetic patients who underwent phacoemulsification performed by a single surgeon employing the horizontal phaco-chop technique. ECD and central corneal thickness (CCT), the coefficient of variation and percentage of polymegathism were measured and compared. Specular microscopy was used to evaluate the number of endothelial cells in patients during surgical pre-assessment and at the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits.

resultsA total of 42 eyes from 42 patients were included: 21 eyes in the T2DM group and 21 eyes in the nondiabetic group. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of age and sex distribution (p = 0.296; p = 0.502, respectively). Mean postoperative (at 1 and 3-month follow-up) endothelial cell count of the T2DM group was not significantly lower than the nondiabetic group (p = 0.341 and p = 0.065, respectively). Postoperative CCT measurements demonstrated no significant variations between groups, showing a mean 557.8 ± 48.0 and 543.3 ± 41.0 μm, respectively (p = 0.472). Nonetheless, significant differences were evidenced for CoV values for both the pre-surgical and the postoperative follow-up visits between groups, as well as ECD values inside each group.

conclusionsThe present study reveals significant differences between pre-surgical and postoperative mean ECD values; however, no statistically significant differences were found when comparing ECD at each follow-up visit between diabetic patients without evidence of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and nondiabetic patients undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCataractCell CountDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Endothelium, CornealFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhacoemulsificationProspective StudiesVisual AcuityCataract surgeryCorneal endotheliumEndothelial cell densityPhacoemulsificationType-two diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30056522
OpenAlexW2883564826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.