ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019
Endothelial cell density changes in diabetic and nondiabetic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04965168 (Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium Following Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Specular Microscopy
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of corneal endothelial changes after phacoemulsification in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of endothelial cell loss in diabetic patients after conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Corneal Endothelial Changes After Phacoemulsification Using the Eight-Chop Technique in Diabetic Eyes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Phaco-Chop versus Divide-and-Conquer in Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the corneal thickness and endothelial changes following uncomplicated phacoemulsification in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with pseudo-exfoliation syndrome by specular microscopy.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Comparison of corneal endothelial changes following phacoemulsification in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Observational
- Pathogenic Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Diabetic Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Corneal structure and endothelial morphological changes after uneventful phacoemulsification in type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2021Observational
- Comparative assessment of the corneal endothelium following phacoemulsification surgery in patients with type II diabetes and nondiabetes.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess endothelial cell density (ECD) changes on diabetic and nondiabetic patients after phacoemulsification surgery employing the phaco-chop technique.
methodsThis is a prospective, experimental and comparative study. We included type-two diabetic (T2DM) patients and nondiabetic patients who underwent phacoemulsification performed by a single surgeon employing the horizontal phaco-chop technique. ECD and central corneal thickness (CCT), the coefficient of variation and percentage of polymegathism were measured and compared. Specular microscopy was used to evaluate the number of endothelial cells in patients during surgical pre-assessment and at the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits.
resultsA total of 42 eyes from 42 patients were included: 21 eyes in the T2DM group and 21 eyes in the nondiabetic group. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of age and sex distribution (p = 0.296; p = 0.502, respectively). Mean postoperative (at 1 and 3-month follow-up) endothelial cell count of the T2DM group was not significantly lower than the nondiabetic group (p = 0.341 and p = 0.065, respectively). Postoperative CCT measurements demonstrated no significant variations between groups, showing a mean 557.8 ± 48.0 and 543.3 ± 41.0 μm, respectively (p = 0.472). Nonetheless, significant differences were evidenced for CoV values for both the pre-surgical and the postoperative follow-up visits between groups, as well as ECD values inside each group.
conclusionsThe present study reveals significant differences between pre-surgical and postoperative mean ECD values; however, no statistically significant differences were found when comparing ECD at each follow-up visit between diabetic patients without evidence of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and nondiabetic patients undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.