Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30056421›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2018

Can 11C-PiB-PET Relative Delivery R1 or 11C-PiB-PET Perfusion Replace 18F-FDG-PET in the Assessment of Brain Neurodegeneration?

Francisco P M Oliveira, Ana Paula Moreira, Alexandre de Mendonça, Ana Verdelho, Carolina Xavier, Dalila Barroca, Joana Rio, Eva Cardoso, Ângela Cruz, Antero Abrunhosa and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of early-phase [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early-phaseScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. PET Parametric Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. [Surgery 4.0-are we ready?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco P M OliveiraCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana Paula MoreiraNuclear Medicine Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
Alexandre de MendonçaDepartment of Neurology and Laboratory of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana VerdelhoDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Santa Maria Hospital - CHLN, ISAMB, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carolina XavierCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Dalila BarrocaCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana RioCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Eva CardosoCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ângela CruzCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Antero AbrunhosaCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoCIBIT, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS - P), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
University of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPittsburgh Compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) is used to visualize in vivo amyloid plaques in the brain. Frequently the PiB examinations are complemented with a fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scan to further assess neurodegeneration.

objectiveOur goal is to identify alternative correlates of FDG images by assessing which kinetic methods originate PiB derived relative delivery ratio (R1) images that can be correlated with the FDG images, and to compare them with PiB perfusion (pPiB) images obtained from the early-phase of PiB acquisition.

methodsWe selected 52 patients with cognitive impairment who underwent a dynamic PiB and FDG acquisitions. To compute the R1 images, two simplified reference tissue models (SRTM and SRTM2) and two multi-linear reference tissue models (MRTM and MRTM2) were used. The pPiB images were obtained in two different time intervals.

resultsAll six types of images were of good quality and highly correlated with the FDG images (mean voxelwise within-subjects r > 0.92). The higher correlation was found for FDG-R1(MRTM). Regarding the voxelwise regional correlation, the higher mean all brain correlations was r = 0.825 for FDG-R1(MRTM) and statistically significant in the whole brain analysis.

conclusionAll R1 and pPiB images here tested have potential to assess the metabolic impact of neurodegeneration almost as reliably as the FDG images. However, this is not enough to validate these images for a single-subject analysis compared with the FDG image, and thus they cannot yet be used clinically to replace the FDG image before such evaluation.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCarbon RadioisotopesCognition DisordersFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurodegenerative DiseasesTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedCarbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F1811C-PIB18F-FDGAlzheimer’s diseasecompartmental modelsneurodegenerationperfusion

Identifiers

PMID30056421
PMCPMC6087437
OpenAlexW2884209345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.