Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30055710›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2018

Impact of the Out-of-School Nutrition and Physical Activity (OSNAP) Group Randomized Controlled Trial on Children's Food, Beverage, and Calorie Consumption among Snacks Served.

Rebekka M Lee, Catherine M Giles, Angie L Cradock, Karen M Emmons, Cassandra Okechukwu, Erica L Kenney, J Thayer, Steven L Gortmaker

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebekka M Lee
Catherine M Giles
Angie L Cradock
Karen M Emmons
Cassandra Okechukwu
Erica L Kenney
J Thayer
Steven L Gortmaker

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Family Responsive Workplaces &Low-Wage Employee HealthU01AG027669 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI BERKMAN, LISA F · 2005 to 2012
$7.5M
HARVARD PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER ON NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY-CATEGORY 1U48DP001946 · DP · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GORTMAKER, STEVEN L · 2009 to 2013
$7.5M
Dissemination Research to Reduce Cancer DisparitiesK05CA124415 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI EMMONS, KAREN M. · 2007 to 2011
$810k
Effective Training Models for Implementing Health-Promoting Practices AfterschoolR21CA201567 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LEE, REBEKKA MAIRGHREAD · 2016 to 2017
$386k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001946NCI NIH HHS K05 CA124415NCI NIH HHS R21 CA201567NIA NIH HHS U01 AG027669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfterschool interventions have been found to improve the nutritional quality of snacks served. However, there is limited evidence on how these interventions affect children's snacking behaviors.

objectiveOur aim was to determine the impact of an afterschool intervention focused at the school district, site, family, and child levels on dietary consumption of foods and beverages served at snack.

designThis was a secondary analysis of a group-randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS/

settingData were collected from 400 children at 20 afterschool sites in Boston, MA before (fall 2010) and after (spring 2011) intervention implementation.

interventionThe Out-of-School Nutrition and Physical Activity intervention aimed to promote fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and water, while limiting sugary drinks and trans fats. Researchers worked with district foodservice staff to change snack foods and beverages. Teams of afterschool staff participated in three 3-hour learning collaborative sessions to build skills and created action plans for changing site practices. The intervention included family and child nutrition education.

main outcome measuresResearch assistants observed dietary snack consumption using a validated measure on 2 days per site at baseline and follow-up. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: This study used multivariable regression models, accounting for clustering of observations, to assess the intervention effect, and conducted post-hoc stratified analyses by foodservice type.

resultsChildren in intervention sites had greater decreases in consumption of juice (-0.61 oz/snack, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.12), beverage calories (-29.1 kcal/snack, 95% CI -40.2 to 18.0), foods with trans fats (-0.12 servings/snack, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.04), total calories (-47.7 kcal/snack, 95% CI -68.2 to -27.2), and increases in consumption of whole grains (0.10 servings/snack, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.18) compared to controls. In post-hoc analyses, sites with on-site foodservice had significant improvements for all outcomes (P<0.001), with no effect for sites with satellite foodservice.

conclusionsResults demonstrate that an afterschool intervention can improve children's dietary snack consumption, particularly at sites with on-site foodservice.

Indexed as

Food ServicesSnacksBeveragesBostonChildDiet, HealthyEatingEnergy IntakeExerciseFeeding BehaviorFemaleFruitHealth PromotionHumansMaleNutritive ValueAfterschoolChildhood obesityGroup randomized trialNutritionSnack

Identifiers

PMID30055710
PMCPMC7604883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.