Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30055642›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2018

Factors affecting intraosseous pressure measurement.

Michael Beverly, David Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Upper tibial MRI vascular marks lost in early knee osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael BeverlyBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. michael.beverly@btinternet.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-5045
David MurrayBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 12425/1.5/SC/wj
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough a raised intraosseous pressure (IOP) has been found in osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis, the normal physiology of subchondral circulation is poorly understood. We developed an animal model and explored the physiology of normal subchondral perfusion and IOP.

methodsIn 21 anaesthetised rabbits, 44 intraosseous needles were placed in the subchondral bone of the femoral head (n = 6), femoral condyle (n = 7) or proximal tibia (n = 31). Needles were connected to pressure transducers and a chart recorder. In 14 subjects, the proximal femoral artery and vein were clamped alternately. In five subjects, arterial pressure was measured simultaneously in the opposite femoral artery.

resultsThe average IOP at all 44 sites was 24.5 mmHg with variability within SD 6.8 and between subjects SD 11.5. IOP was not significantly influenced by gender, weight, site or size of a needle. Needle clearance by flushing caused a prolonged drop in IOP whereas after clearance by aspiration, recovery was rapid. IOP recordings exhibited wave patterns synchronous with the arterial pulse, with respiration and with drug circulation time. There was a correlation between IOP and blood pressure (13 sites in 5 subjects, Pearson correlation 0.829, p < 0.0005). There was a correlation between IOP and the associated pulse pressure (PP) in 44 sites among 21 subjects (Pearson correlation 0.788, p < 0.001). In 14 subjects (31 sites), arterial occlusion caused a significant reduction in IOP and loss of PP (p < 0.0001). Venous occlusion significantly raised IOP with preservation of the PP (p < 0.012).

conclusionOur study shows that subchondral cancellous bone behaves as a perfused tissue and that IOP is mainly a reflection of arterial supply. A single measure of IOP is variable and reflects only perfusion at the needle tip rather than being a measure of venous back pressure. Alternate proximal vessel clamping offers a new means of exploring the physiology of subchondral perfusion. We describe a model that will allow further study of IOP such as during loading.

Indexed as

Femur HeadKnee JointAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemurPressureRabbitsTibiaBone blood flowIntraosseous pressureOsteoarthritisOsteonecrosisPhysiologySubchondralVascular occlusion

Identifiers

PMID30055642
PMCPMC6064116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.