Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30055115›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2019

Osmotic stress enhances suberization of apoplastic barriers in barley seminal roots: analysis of chemical, transcriptomic and physiological responses.

Tino Kreszies, Nandhini Shellakkutti, Alina Osthoff, Peng Yu, Jutta A Baldauf, Viktoria V Zeisler-Diehl, Kosala Ranathunge, Frank Hochholdinger, Lukas Schreiber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Investigating the Role and Response of Root Groups ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tino KresziesDepartment of Ecophysiology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Nandhini ShellakkuttiDepartment of Ecophysiology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Alina OsthoffCrop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Peng YuCrop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Jutta A BaldaufCrop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Viktoria V Zeisler-DiehlDepartment of Ecophysiology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Kosala RanathungeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Perth, Australia.
Frank HochholdingerCrop Functional Genomics, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas SchreiberDepartment of Ecophysiology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Alexander-von-Humboldt FoundationDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK2064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is more drought tolerant than other cereals, thus making it an excellent model for the study of the chemical, transcriptomic and physiological effects of water deficit. Roots are the first organ to sense soil water deficit. Therefore, we studied the response of barley seminal roots to different water potentials induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000. We investigated changes in anatomical parameters by histochemistry and microscopy, quantitative and qualitative changes in suberin composition by analytical chemistry, transcript changes by RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq), and the radial water and solute movement of roots using a root pressure probe. In response to osmotic stress, genes in the suberin biosynthesis pathway were upregulated that correlated with increased suberin amounts in the endodermis and an overall reduction in hydraulic conductivity (Lp

Indexed as

Biological TransportCell WallDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingHordeumLipidsOsmotic PressurePlant RootsPolyethylene GlycolsSequence Analysis, RNALipidspolyethylene glycol 8000Polyethylene Glycolssuberinapoplastbarleyosmotic stressrootsuberintranscriptomicswater deficitwater transport

Identifiers

PMID30055115
PMCPMC6586163
OpenAlexW2883086135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.