Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30055094›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant pathology2018

Dissecting interplays between Vitis vinifera L. and grapevine virus B (GVB) under field conditions.

Walter Chitarra, Danila Cuozzo, Alessandra Ferrandino, Francesca Secchi, Sabrina Palmano, Irene Perrone, Paolo Boccacci, Chiara Pagliarani, Ivana Gribaudo, Franco Mannini and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Dissecting Interaction betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular memory ofHorticulture research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Walter ChitarraResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Via XVIII Aprile 26, Conegliano, 31015, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-3794
Danila CuozzoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Alessandra FerrandinoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin (DISAFA), Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.
Francesca SecchiDepartment of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin (DISAFA), Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.
Sabrina PalmanoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Irene PerroneInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Paolo BoccacciInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Chiara PagliaraniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Ivana GribaudoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Franco ManniniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.
Giorgio GambinoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino, 10135, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant virus infections are often difficult to characterize as they result from a complex molecular and physiological interplay between a pathogen and its host. In this study, the impact of the phloem-limited grapevine virus B (GVB) on the Vitis vinifera L. wine-red cultivar Albarossa was analysed under field conditions. Trials were carried out over two growing seasons by combining agronomic, molecular, biochemical and ecophysiological approaches. The data showed that GVB did not induce macroscopic symptoms on 'Albarossa', but affected the ecophysiological performances of vines in terms of assimilation rates, particularly at the end of the season, without compromising yield and vigour. In GVB-infected plants, the accumulation of soluble carbohydrates in the leaves and transcriptional changes in sugar- and photosynthetic-related genes seemed to trigger defence responses similar to those observed in plants infected by phytoplasmas, although to a lesser extent. In addition, GVB activated berry secondary metabolism. In particular, total anthocyanins and their acetylated forms accumulated at higher levels in GVB-infected than in GVB-free berries, consistent with the expression profiles of the related biosynthetic genes. These results contribute to improve our understanding of the multifaceted grapevine-virus interaction.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsCarbohydratesClimateFlavonoidsFlexiviridaeFruitPhotosynthesisRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseSeasonsVitisAnthocyaninsCarbohydratesFlavonoidsRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylaseanthocyaninsgas exchangegrapevineplant-virus interactionsugar signalling

Identifiers

PMID30055094
PMCPMC6638183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.