Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30055089›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2018

Mapping influenza activity in emergency departments in France using Bayesian model-based geostatistics.

Juliette Paireau, Camille Pelat, Céline Caserio-Schönemann, Isabelle Pontais, Yann Le Strat, Daniel Lévy-Bruhl, Simon Cauchemez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliette PaireauMathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-6256
Camille PelatSanté publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Céline Caserio-SchönemannSanté publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Isabelle PontaisSanté publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Yann Le StratSanté publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Daniel Lévy-BruhlSanté publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Simon CauchemezMathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaps of influenza activity are important tools to monitor influenza epidemics and inform policymakers. In France, the availability of a high-quality data set from the Oscour

objectiveOur objective was to create reliable weekly interpolated maps of influenza activity in the ED setting, to inform Santé publique France (the French national public health agency) and local healthcare authorities.

methodsWe used Oscour

resultsOver the study period, 45 565 (0.82%) visits were coded as influenza cases. Maps resulting from the model are presented for each week, displaying the posterior mean of the influenza proportion and its associated uncertainty. Our model performed better than Kriging.

conclusionsOur model allows producing smoothed maps where the random noise has been properly removed to reveal the spatial risk surface. The algorithm was incorporated into the national surveillance system to produce maps in real time and could be applied to other diseases.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTopography, MedicalBayes TheoremFranceHumansInfluenza, Humangeographic mappinginfluenzapublic health surveillancespatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID30055089
PMCPMC6185885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.