Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054842›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2018

CEGP-003 Spray Has a Similar Hemostatic Effect to Epinephrine Injection in Cases of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Byoung Wook Bang, Don Haeng Lee, Hyung Kil Kim, Kye Sook Kwon, Yong Woon Shin, Su Jin Hong, Jong Ho Moon

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Byoung Wook BangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4104-7342
Don Haeng LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, South Korea. ldh@inha.ac.kr.
Hyung Kil KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, South Korea.
Kye Sook KwonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, South Korea.
Yong Woon ShinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, South Korea.
Su Jin HongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, South Korea.
Jong Ho MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, South Korea.
Inha University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopically applicable hemostatic agents have been demonstrated to have high initial hemostasis rates in cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

aimsThe authors developed a new hemostatic powder (CEGP-003) and evaluated its hemostatic and ulcer healing effects in UGIB.

methodsPatients with peptic ulcer or post-endoscopic resection bleeding were randomly assigned to be treated by epinephrine injection or CEGP-003 spray. All patients were placed under observation for 3 days and underwent second-look endoscopy. The primary outcome was initial hemostasis rate, and the secondary outcomes were rebleeding rate and ulcer healing effect.

resultsSeventy-two patients with UGIB were enrolled in this study. Causes of bleeding were peptic ulcer (15, 20.5%), post-endoscopic mucosal resection (11, 15.1%), and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding (47, 64.4%). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 89.2% (34/37) of patients in the epinephrine group and in 100% (35/35) in the CEGP-003 group (p = 0.115). Rebleeding occurred in 2.7% (1/37) and 8.6% (3/35) in the epinephrine and CEGP-003 groups, respectively (p = 0.35). Three days after endoscopic hemostasis, the ulcer healing effects of epinephrine and CEGP-003 were similar (p = 0.79).

conclusionThis study shows that CEGP-003 spray has a hemostatic effect similar to epinephrine in terms of initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates. The authors consider CEGP-003 a potential therapeutic tool for UGIB as a definitive or bridge therapy and that it is particularly useful for oozing lesions after endoscopic resection.

Indexed as

Hemostasis, EndoscopicAgedCelluloseEpidermal Growth FactorEpinephrineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageProspective StudiesVasoconstrictor AgentsCelluloseEpidermal Growth FactorEpinephrinehydroxyethylcelluloseVasoconstrictor AgentsEndoscopicGastrointestinal hemorrhageHemostasisHemostatic techniquesWound healing

Identifiers

PMID30054842
OpenAlexW2883932145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.