Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054817›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2018

Malignant colo-duodenal fistula: management based on proposed classification.

Vikas Gupta, Kailash C Kurdia, Pavan Kumar, Thakur D Yadav, Ajay Gulati, Saroj K Sinha, Kim Vaiphei, Rakesh Kochhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Malignant recto-jejunal fistula: a rare case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vikas GuptaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. vikaspgi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-3307
Kailash C KurdiaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Pavan KumarDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Thakur D YadavDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay GulatiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Saroj K SinhaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kim VaipheiDepartment of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rakesh KochharDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duodenal involvement in colonic malignancy is a rare event and poses challenge to surgeons as it may entail major resection in a malnourished patient. Nine patients with malignant colo-duodenal fistula were reviewed retrospectively. Depending on the pattern of duodenal involvement, it was classified as-type I involving lateral duodenal wall less than half circumference; type II involving more than half circumference away from papilla; type III involving more than half circumference close to papilla. Type I was managed with sleeve resection, type II with segmental and type III with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Median age was 47 years, with male to female ratio of 2:1. Eight patients had anemia and seven had hypoproteinemia. Tumor was located in right colon in eight patients and distal transverse colon in one. Diagnosis of fistula was established by CT abdomen in seven (78%), foregut endoscopy in three and intraoperatively in two patients. Two patients had metastatic disease. Elective resection was done in seven while two required emergence surgery. Five patients underwent sleeve resection of the duodenum, two underwent segmental resection and two required pancreaticoduodenectomy. All patients had negative resection margin. One patient died. Median survival was 14 months in eight survivors. Duodenal resection in malignant colo-duodenal fistula should be tailored based on the extent and pattern of duodenal involvement. Negative margin can be achieved even with sleeve resection. En bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy is sometimes required due to extensive involvement. Resection with negative margin can achieve good survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedColectomyColonic DiseasesColonic NeoplasmsDuodenal DiseasesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansIntestinal FistulaMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCancerColectomyColonDuodenumFistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyResection

Identifiers

PMID30054817
OpenAlexW2884342304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.