Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054809›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019

Chicken or the Egg: Microbial Alterations in Biopsy Samples of Patients with Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.

Gabor Decsi, Jozsef Soki, Bernadett Pap, Gabriella Dobra, Maria Harmati, Sandor Kormondi, Tibor Pankotai, Gabor Braunitzer, Janos Minarovits, Istvan Sonkodi and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metatranscriptomic analysis of anJournal of oral microbiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabor DecsiFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 64, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
Jozsef SokiAlbert Szent-Gyorgyi Clinical Centre, Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary.
Bernadett PapBiological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Gabriella DobraBiological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Maria HarmatiBiological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Sandor KormondiAlbert Szent-Gyorgyi Clinical Centre, Department of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary.
Tibor PankotaiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged, Kozep fasor 52, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Gabor BraunitzerdicomLAB Ltd., Pulz u. 46/b, Szeged, H-6724, Hungary.
Janos MinarovitsFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Biology and Experimental Dental Research, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 64, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
Istvan SonkodiFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 64, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
Edit UrbanAlbert Szent-Gyorgyi Clinical Centre, Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary.
Istvan Balazs NemethDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
Katalin NagyFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 64, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
Krisztina BuzasBiological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary. kr.buzas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-2033
University of Szeged · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HU

Funding

GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00011GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00015Magyar Tudományos Akadémia János Bolyai Research ScholarshipNational Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary NKFI-6-K funding scheme, 11493 project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral carcinogenesis often leads to the alteration of the microbiota at the site of the tumor, but data are scarce regarding the microbial communities of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Punch biopsies were taken from healthy and non-healthy mucosa of OPMD patients to analyze the microbiome using metagenome sequencing. In healthy oral mucosa biopsies the bacterial phyla Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were detected by Ion Torrent sequencing. The same phyla as well as the phyla Fibrobacteres and Spirochaetes were present in the OPMD biopsies. On the species level, there were 10 bacterial species unique to the healthy tissue and 35 species unique to the OPMD lesions whereas eight species were detected in both samples. We observed that the relative abundance of Streptococcus mitis decreased in the OPMD lesions compared to the uninvolved tissue. In contrast, the relative abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum, implicated in carcinogenesis, was elevated in OPMD. We detected markedly increased bacterial diversity in the OPMD lesions compared to the healthy oral mucosa. The ratio of S. mitis and F. nucleatum are characteristically altered in the OPMD lesions compared to the healthy mucosa.

Indexed as

AgedBacteremiaBacteriaBiopsyCase-Control StudiesDNA, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHungaryMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsPrognosisDNA, BacterialLeukoplakiaLichenMetagenome sequencingOPMDOral microbiome

Identifiers

PMID30054809
OpenAlexW2884284222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.