Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054644›Full record

ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2018

[Revision surgery in acute periprosthetic knee joint infections].

T Hawellek, F T Beil, J Hubert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Periprosthetic fractures of the knee : Revision arthroplasty].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Pulsatile lavage systems and their potential to penetrate soft tissue.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T HawellekKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
F T BeilKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. frank-timo.beil@med.uni-goettingen.de.
J HubertKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReduction of pathogens in the knee joint by removal of infected periprosthetic soft tissue, irrigation and modular implant exchange of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to eliminate the infection and long-term preservation of the TKA. INDICATIONS: Early infection of TKA (<4 weeks postoperatively); acute hematogenous TKA infection (symptom duration <3 weeks). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Delayed (>4 weeks postoperatively) or chronic TKA infection; TKA loosening; difficult-to-treat pathogens; critical soft tissue with draining sinus tract. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Excision of the wound or old surgical scar (= primary approach to the knee joint). Preparation of subcutaneous tissue. Opening the joint capsule. Removal of the old suture in tissue layers. Five tissue samples taken for microbiological and 1 tissue sample for histopathological examination using an unused instrument from the knee joint. Debridement of the upper recesses with complete synovectomy. Partial resection of Hoffa's fat body. Eversion of the patella. Resection of peripatellar soft tissue and infection membranes from the medial and lateral part of the capsule. Removal of the polyethylene inlay. Débridement of the posterior joint capsule with protection of vessels and nerve. Systematic removal of avital and infected periprosthetic tissue. Checking for correct fit of the femoral and tibial part of TKA. Antiseptic rinsing of the joint cavity with mechanical cleaning of the TKA. Extensive irrigation of the joint cavity by jet lavage (3-5 l saline solution). Glove change of the surgical team and new operation coverage. Inserting new polyethylene. Layerwise wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Removal of redon drain on postoperative day 2. Physiotherapy and CPM. Removal of cutaneous suture about 2 weeks postoperatively. Antibiotic treatment for 12 weeks postoperatively (2 weeks intravenous, 10 weeks per oral). Checking of inflammatory markers.

resultsUsing correct indications and therapy, up to 90% of patients with acute periprosthetic TKA infection can be successfully treated with infection elimination and TKA preservation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDebridementDevice RemovalHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeDebridementEarly infectionInfectionPolyethylene exchangeTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID30054644
OpenAlexW2883284879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.