Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054595›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2018

CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway.

Chris D Richardson, Katelynn R Kazane, Sharon J Feng, Elena Zelin, Nicholas L Bray, Axel J Schäfer, Stephen N Floor, Jacob E Corn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mechanisms and genomic implications of break-induced replication.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Systemic in utero gene editing as a treatment for cystic fibrosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chris D RichardsonInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Katelynn R KazaneInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sharon J FengInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elena ZelinInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nicholas L BrayInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Axel J SchäferDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Stephen N FloorDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jacob E CornInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. jcorn@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-5309
Innovative Genomics Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas genome editing creates targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are processed by cellular repair pathways, including the incorporation of exogenous DNA via single-strand template repair (SSTR). To determine the genetic basis of SSTR in human cells, we developed a coupled inhibition-cutting system capable of interrogating multiple editing outcomes in the context of thousands of individual gene knockdowns. We found that human Cas9-induced SSTR requires the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, which is normally implicated in interstrand cross-link repair. The FA pathway does not directly impact error-prone, non-homologous end joining, but instead diverts repair toward SSTR. Furthermore, FANCD2 protein localizes to Cas9-induced DSBs, indicating a direct role in regulating genome editing. Since FA is itself a genetic disease, these data imply that patient genotype and/or transcriptome may impact the effectiveness of gene editing treatments and that treatments biased toward FA repair pathways could have therapeutic value.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell Line, TumorClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairFanconi AnemiaGene EditingGenotypeHCT116 CellsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansJurkat CellsK562 CellsMCF-7 Cells

Identifiers

PMID30054595
OpenAlexW2952097794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.