Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054525›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Complementary intestinal mucosa and microbiota responses to caloric restriction.

Kalina Duszka, Sandrine Ellero-Simatos, Ghim Siong Ow, Marianne Defernez, Eeswari Paramalingam, Adrian Tett, Shi Ying, Jürgen König, Arjan Narbad, Vladimir A Kuznetsov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gut Microbiome as Potential Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis.Current treatment options in neurology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Kalina DuszkaLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, 308232, Singapore. kalina.duszka@univie.ac.at.
Sandrine Ellero-SimatosToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, 31300, France.
Ghim Siong OwBioinformatics Institute, A*STAR Biomedical Sciences Institutes, Singapore, 13867, Singapore.
Marianne DefernezQuadram Institute Bioscience, , Norwich Science Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR7UA, UK.
Eeswari ParamalingamLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, 308232, Singapore.
Adrian TettQuadram Institute Bioscience, , Norwich Science Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR7UA, UK.
Shi YingQuadram Institute Bioscience, , Norwich Science Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR7UA, UK.
Jürgen KönigDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2184-9372
Arjan NarbadQuadram Institute Bioscience, , Norwich Science Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR7UA, UK.
Vladimir A KuznetsovBioinformatics Institute, A*STAR Biomedical Sciences Institutes, Singapore, 13867, Singapore.
Hervé GuillouToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, 31300, France.
Walter WahliLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, 308232, Singapore. Walter.Wahli@ntu.edu.sg.
Quadram Institute · GBUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGUniversity of Vienna · ATNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/00042572Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10353Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestine is key for nutrient absorption and for interactions between the microbiota and its host. Therefore, the intestinal response to caloric restriction (CR) is thought to be more complex than that of any other organ. Submitting mice to 25% CR during 14 days induced a polarization of duodenum mucosa cell gene expression characterised by upregulation, and downregulation of the metabolic and immune/inflammatory pathways, respectively. The HNF, PPAR, STAT, and IRF families of transcription factors, particularly the Pparα and Isgf3 genes, were identified as potentially critical players in these processes. The impact of CR on metabolic genes in intestinal mucosa was mimicked by inhibition of the mTOR pathway. Furthermore, multiple duodenum and faecal metabolites were altered in CR mice. These changes were dependent on microbiota and their magnitude corresponded to microbial density. Further experiments using mice with depleted gut bacteria and CR-specific microbiota transfer showed that the gene expression polarization observed in the mucosa of CR mice is independent of the microbiota and its metabolites. The holistic interdisciplinary approach that we applied allowed us to characterize various regulatory aspects of the host and microbiota response to CR.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionMicrobiotaAnimalsDuodenumFecesGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksInflammationIntestinal MucosaMaleMetabolomeMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID30054525
PMCPMC6063912
OpenAlexW2883974117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.