Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Iliza M Butera, Ryan A Stevenson, Brannon D Mangus, Tiffany G Woynaroski, René H Gifford, Mark T Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visual Influences on Auditory Behavioral, Neural, and Perceptual Processes: A Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iliza M ButeraVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. ilizabutera@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-5285
Ryan A StevensonDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1037-7736
Brannon D MangusMurfreesboro Medical Clinic and Surgicenter, Murfreesboro, TN, USA.
Tiffany G WoynaroskiVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
René H GiffordVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mark T WallaceVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0166-906X

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002245 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$9.3M
Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)KL2TR000446 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Individual differences in cochlear implant users' audiovisual integration and links to speech proficiencyF31DC015956 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BUTERA, ILIZA MYERS · 2016 to 2018
$86k
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) RGPIN-2017-04656Gouvernement du Canada | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada) 435-2017-0936NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000446NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002245NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015956NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH064913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual temporal processing in CI users is poorly understood. In this study, we tested unisensory (auditory alone, visual alone) and multisensory (audiovisual) temporal processing in postlingually deafened CI users (n = 48) and normal-hearing controls (n = 54) using simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. We varied the timing onsets between the auditory and visual components of either a syllable/viseme or a simple flash/beep pairing, and participants indicated either which stimulus appeared first (TOJ) or if the pair occurred simultaneously (SJ). Results indicate that temporal binding windows-the interval within which stimuli are likely to be perceptually 'bound'-are not significantly different between groups for either speech or non-speech stimuli. However, the point of subjective simultaneity for speech was less visually leading in CI users, who interestingly, also had improved visual-only TOJ thresholds. Further signal detection analysis suggests that this SJ shift may be due to greater visual bias within the CI group, perhaps reflecting heightened attentional allocation to visual cues.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsLanguageAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAuditory PerceptionDeafnessFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpeech PerceptionTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30054512
PMCPMC6063927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.