Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30054316›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

A dynamic model of transmission and elimination of peste des petits ruminants in Ethiopia.

Guillaume Fournié, Agnès Waret-Szkuta, Anton Camacho, Laike M Yigezu, Dirk U Pfeiffer, François Roger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillaume FourniéVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics, and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, United Kingdom; gfournie@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-1201
Agnès Waret-SzkutaInteractions Hôtes-Agents Pathogènes, Université de Toulouse, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Anton CamachoEpicentre, 75012 Paris, France.
Laike M YigezuNational Veterinary Institute, Debre-Zeit, Ethiopia.
Dirk U PfeifferVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics, and Public Health Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, United Kingdom.
François RogerUMR Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes, Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Campus International de Baillarguet, Université de Montpellier, 34398 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR), a devastating viral disease of sheep and goats, has been targeted by the global community for eradication within the next 15 years. Although an efficacious attenuated live vaccine is available, the lack of knowledge about the transmission potential of PPR virus (PPRV) may compromise eradication efforts. By fitting a metapopulation model simulating PPRV spread to the results of a nationwide serological survey in Ethiopia, we estimated the level of viral transmission in an endemic setting and the vaccination coverage required for elimination. Results suggest that the pastoral production system as a whole acts as a viral reservoir, from which PPRV spills over into the sedentary production system, where viral persistence is uncertain. Estimated levels of PPRV transmission indicate that viral spread could be prevented if the proportion of immune small ruminants is kept permanently above 37% in at least 71% of pastoral village populations. However, due to the high turnover of these populations, maintaining the fraction of immune animals above this threshold would require high vaccine coverage within villages, and vaccination campaigns to be conducted annually. Adapting vaccination strategies to the specific characteristics of the local epidemiological context and small ruminant population dynamics would result in optimized allocation of limited resources and increase the likelihood of PPR eradication.

Indexed as

AnimalsEthiopiaGoatsPeste-des-Petits-RuminantsSheepVaccinationcontroleliminationeradicationmathematical modelvaccination

Identifiers

PMID30054316
PMCPMC6099864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.