ArticleRespiratory medicine2018
Time to treatment and survival in veterans with lung cancer eligible for curative intent therapy.
Article in Respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between time-to-treatment and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.Thorax · 2022Pooled it
- Redefining treatment interval in lung cancer surgery in the era of prehabilitation: a systematic review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Survivorship Challenges and Supportive Care in Lung Cancer.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Curative intent therapy of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a patient-centered precision approach to assess, measure, and interpret benefits and harms.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Impact of Waiting Times on Mortality in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study in Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Impact of time-to-treatment initiation on survival in single primary non-small cell lung Cancer: A population-based study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Association of Surgical Timing with Outcomes in Early Stage Lung Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Timely Curative Treatment and Overall Mortality Among Veterans With Stage I NSCLC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
- The Effect of Timeliness of Care on Lung Cancer Survival - A Population-Based Approach.Annals of global health · 2023Article
- Diagnosis-to-surgery interval and survival for different histologies of stage I-IIA lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- Delayed surgery after histologic or radiologic-diagnosed clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Institute of Medicine emphasizes care timeliness as an important quality metric. We assessed treatment timeliness in stage I-IIIA lung cancer patients deemed eligible for curative intent therapy and analyzed the relationship between time to treatment (TTT) and timely treatment (TT) with survival.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of stage I-IIIA lung cancer deemed eligible for curative intent therapy at the VA San Diego Healthcare System between 10/2010-4/2017. We defined TTT as days from chest tumor board to treatment initiation and TT using guideline recommendations. We used multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regressions for survival analyses.
resultsIn 177 veterans, the median TTT was 35 days (29 days for chemoradiation, 36 for surgical resection, 42 for definitive radiation). TT occurred in 33% or 77% of patients when the most or least timely guideline recommendation was used, respectively. Patient characteristics associated with longer TTT included other cancer history, high simplified comorbidity score, stage I disease, and definitive radiation treatment. In MVA, TTT and TT [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.27, 1.01) for least timely definition] were not associated with OS in stage I-IIIA patients, or disease-free survival in subgroup analyses of 122 stage I patients [HR 1.49 (0.62, 3.59) for least timely definition].
conclusionTreatment was timely in 33-77% of veterans with lung cancer deemed eligible for curative intent therapy. TTT and TT were not associated with survival. The time interval between diagnosis and treatment may offer an opportunity to deliver or improve other cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.