ArticleGenome medicine2018
Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer.
Article in Genome medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteogenomics: decoding cancer in multiple dimensions.MedScience · 2026Review
- Article
- New insights of potential biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy: integrated multi-omic analyses.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Transcriptome-wide gene expression outlier analysis pinpoints therapeutic vulnerabilities in colorectal cancer.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- Potential Chemopreventive Effects of Dietary Combination of Phytochemicals against Cancer Development.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Can Systems Biology Advance Clinical Precision Oncology?Cancers · 2021Review
- Pan-cancer proteogenomic investigations identify post-transcriptional kinase targets.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Diabetes and Heart Failure: Multi-Omics Approaches.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Glycoproteomics-based signatures for tumor subtyping and clinical outcome prediction of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Discovery Strategies to Maximize the Clinical Potential of T-Cell Engaging Antibodies for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Integrative molecular analysis of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- Non-invasive Potential Circulating mRNA Markers for Colorectal Adenoma Using Targeted Sequencing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Contributions from the 2018 Literature on Bioinformatics and Translational Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Review
- Targeted Therapy Against the Cell of Origin in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Advances in the Clinical Application of High-throughput Proteomics.Exploratory research and hypothesis in medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough large-scale, next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies of cancers hold promise for enabling precision oncology, challenges remain in integrating NGS with clinically validated biomarkers.
methodsTo overcome such challenges, we utilized the Database of Evidence for Precision Oncology (DEPO) to link druggability to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers. Using a pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we identified tumors with potentially druggable biomarkers consisting of drug-associated mutations, mRNA expression outliers, and protein/phosphoprotein expression outliers identified by DEPO.
resultsWithin the pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we found that 3% are druggable based on FDA-approved drug-mutation interactions in specific cancer types. However, mRNA/phosphoprotein/protein expression outliers and drug repurposing across cancer types suggest potential druggability in up to 16% of tumors. The percentage of potential drug-associated tumors can increase to 48% if we consider preclinical evidence. Further, our analyses showed co-occurring potentially druggable multi-omics alterations in 32% of tumors, indicating a role for individualized combinational therapy, with evidence supporting mTOR/PI3K/ESR1 co-inhibition and BRAF/AKT co-inhibition in 1.6 and 0.8% of tumors, respectively. We experimentally validated a subset of putative druggable mutations in BRAF identified by a protein structure-based computational tool. Finally, analysis of a large-scale drug screening dataset lent further evidence supporting repurposing of drugs across cancer types and the use of expression outliers for inferring druggability.
conclusionsOur results suggest that an integrated analysis platform can nominate multi-omics alterations as biomarkers of druggability and aid ongoing efforts to bring precision oncology to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.