ArticleStem cell research & therapy2018
Tracking embryonic hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow: nanoparticle options to evaluate transplantation efficiency.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of mesenchymal stem cells and polyvinyl alcohol-coated selenium nanoparticles on rats with Alzheimer-like phenotypes.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024Article
- Animal Welfare in Radiation Research: The Importance of Animal Monitoring System.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Nanoparticles targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: Multimodal carriers for the treatment of hematological diseases.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- Article
- Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI Contrast Agents.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2020Review
- Review
- Recent Advances of Magnetic Nanomaterials in Bone Tissue Repair.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the prevalence of therapeutic approaches involving transplanted cells increases, so does the need to noninvasively track the cells to determine their homing patterns. Of particular interest is the fate of transplanted embryonic stem cell-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) used to restore the bone marrow pool following sublethal myeloablative irradiation. The early homing patterns of cell engraftment are not well understood at this time. Until now, longitudinal studies were hindered by the necessity to sacrifice several mice at various time points of study, with samples of the population of lymphoid compartments subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy. Thus, long-term study and serial analysis of the transplanted cells within the same animal was cumbersome, making difficult an accurate documentation of engraftment, functionality, and cell reconstitution patterns.
methodsHere, we devised a noninvasive, nontoxic modality for tracking early HPC homing patterns in the same mice longitudinally over a period of 9 days using mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and magnetic resonance imaging.
resultsThis approach of potential translational importance helps to demonstrate efficient uptake of MSNs by the HPCs as well as retention of MSN labeling in vivo as the cells were traced through various organs, such as the spleen, bone marrow, and kidney. Altogether, early detection of the whereabouts and engraftment of transplanted stem cells may be important to the overall outcome. To accomplish this, there is a need for the development of new noninvasive tools.
conclusionsOur data suggest that multifunctional MSNs can label viably blood-borne HPCs and may help document the distribution and homing in the host followed by successful reconstitution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.