Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053890›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2018

The march of pluripotent stem cells in cardiovascular regenerative medicine.

Haissam Abou-Saleh, Fouad A Zouein, Ahmed El-Yazbi, Despina Sanoudou, Christophe Raynaud, Christopher Rao, Gianfranco Pintus, Hassan Dehaini, Ali H Eid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Editorial: Cardiovascular engineering.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haissam Abou-SalehDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Fouad A ZoueinDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ahmed El-YazbiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Despina SanoudouClinical Genomics and Pharmacogenomics Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, "Attikon" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Christophe RaynaudSidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Christopher RaoDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich, London, UK.
Gianfranco PintusDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Hassan DehainiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali H EidDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. ae81@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Heart failure remains a major contributor to this mortality. Despite major therapeutic advances over the past decades, a better understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms of CVD as well as improved therapeutic strategies for the management or treatment of heart failure are increasingly needed. Loss of myocardium is a major driver of heart failure. An attractive approach that appears to provide promising results in reducing cardiac degeneration is stem cell therapy (SCT). In this review, we describe different types of stem cells, including embryonic and adult stem cells, and we provide a detailed discussion of the properties of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We also present and critically discuss the key methods used for converting somatic cells to pluripotent cells and iPSCs to cardiomyocytes (CMs), along with their advantages and limitations. Integrating and non-integrating reprogramming methods as well as characterization of iPSCs and iPSC-derived CMs are discussed. Furthermore, we critically present various methods of differentiating iPSCs to CMs. The value of iPSC-CMs in regenerative medicine as well as myocardial disease modeling and cardiac regeneration are emphasized.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationHumansMyocytes, CardiacPluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineCardiomyocytesCardiovascular diseaseHeart failureiPSCsRegenerative medicineStem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID30053890
PMCPMC6062943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.