Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053813›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device in conjunction with tubular minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.

Frederic Martens, Geoffrey Lesage, Jeffrey M Muir, Jonathan R Stieber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Annular Closure Device Reduces Symptomatic Reherniation Rates: Results of a Meta-analysis.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Bone-anchored annular closure device leading to histiocytic-inflammation-induced neuropathy with resolution after removal: a case report.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederic MartensDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLV Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Geoffrey LesageDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLV Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Jeffrey M MuirMotion Research, 3-35 Stone Church Rd., Suite 215, Hamilton, ON, L9K 1S4, Canada.
Jonathan R StieberClinical Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, 485 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA. jonathan.stieber@nyumc.org.
Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEBlackberry (Canada) · CANew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy have been recommended as superior to open techniques due to lower blood loss, lower rates of infection and shorter recovery. There are, however, concerns that this approach does not sufficiently remove the herniated nuclear material, thus leaving the patient susceptible to reherniation requiring reoperation. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and viability of an annular closure device in limiting reherniation and reoperation in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy with the assistance of an annular closure device.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed the results from patients treated by a single surgeon between March 2011 and December 2017. All patients had been diagnosed with a large (≥ 5 mm) defect and were treated via minimally invasive surgical techniques. Outcomes included demographic data, the procedural duration and the rates of symptomatic reherniation and reoperation.

results60 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42 years (range: 19-66); mean BMI was 24.1 (range: 16.7-36.3). Mean surgical duration was 29 min (range: 16-50). Reoperation was required in 5% (3/60) of patients, although only 3% (2/60) experienced symptomatic reherniation at the index level. No other complications were reported.

conclusionsIn our study, the use of an annular closure device during minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in a population of patients with large herniations was associated with low rates of reherniation and reoperation at the index level. While more research is required, the results of this study demonstrate the safety and viability of the annular closure device as an adjunct to minimally invasive discectomy.

Indexed as

Bone-Anchored ProsthesisAdultAgedDiskectomy, PercutaneousFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPeriodontal DressingsProsthesis DesignRecurrenceBarricaidResins, SyntheticAnnular closure deviceLimited discectomyLumbar disc herniationMicroscopic discectomyMinimally invasiveTubular retractor

Identifiers

PMID30053813
PMCPMC6064165
OpenAlexW2884808192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.