Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053800›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2018

Positive cofactor 4 (PC4) contributes to the regulation of replication-dependent canonical histone gene expression.

Aleksandra Brzek, Marlena Cichocka, Jakub Dolata, Wojciech Juzwa, Daniel Schümperli, Katarzyna Dorota Raczynska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra BrzekDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Wieniawskiego 1, 61-712, Poznan, Poland.
Marlena CichockaDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Wieniawskiego 1, 61-712, Poznan, Poland.
Jakub DolataDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Wieniawskiego 1, 61-712, Poznan, Poland.
Wojciech JuzwaDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Daniel SchümperliInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 4, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Katarzyna Dorota RaczynskaDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Wieniawskiego 1, 61-712, Poznan, Poland. doracz@amu.edu.pl.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej FNP START 2016Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2012/05/B/NZ2/00826Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2013/11/N/NZ1/00010Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2015/19/B/NZ1/00233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCore canonical histones are required in the S phase of the cell cycle to pack newly synthetized DNA, therefore the expression of their genes is highly activated during DNA replication. In mammalian cells, this increment is achieved by both enhanced transcription and 3' end processing. In this paper, we described positive cofactor 4 (PC4) as a protein that contributes to the regulation of replication-dependent histone gene expression.

resultsWe showed that PC4 influences RNA polymerase II recruitment to histone gene loci in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The most important effect was observed in S phase where PC4 knockdown leads to the elevated level of RNA polymerase II on histone genes, which corresponds to the increased total level of those gene transcripts. The opposite effect was caused by PC4 overexpression. Moreover, we found that PC4 has a negative effect on the unique 3' end processing of histone pre-mRNAs that can be based on the interaction of PC4 with U7 snRNP and CstF64. Interestingly, this effect does not depend on the cell cycle.

conclusionsWe conclude that PC4 might repress RNA polymerase II recruitment and transcription of replication-dependent histone genes in order to maintain the very delicate balance between histone gene expression and DNA synthesis. It guards the cell from excess of histones in S phase. Moreover, PC4 might promote the interaction of cleavage and polyadenylation complex with histone pre-mRNAs, that might impede with the recruitment of histone cleavage complex. This in turn decreases the 3' end processing efficiency of histone gene transcripts.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationCell CycleCleavage Stimulation FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHistonesHumansRibonucleoprotein, U7 Small NuclearRNA 3' End ProcessingRNA Polymerase IITranscription FactorsCleavage Stimulation FactorDNA-Binding ProteinsHistonesRibonucleoprotein, U7 Small NuclearRNA Polymerase IISUB1 protein, humanTranscription Factors3′ end processing efficiencyCell cyclePC4 transcriptional coactivatorReplication-dependent histonesRNAP2 recruitmentU7 snRNP

Identifiers

PMID30053800
PMCPMC6062981
OpenAlexW2883656738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.