Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053118›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019

Resource Utilization and Costs in Adolescents Treated for Cancer in Pediatric vs Adult Institutions.

Paul C Nathan, Karen E Bremner, Ning Liu, Sumit Gupta, Mark L Greenberg, Mary L McBride, Murray D Krahn, Claire de Oliveira

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ewing sarcoma of the thumb presenting in a Hispanic patient: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparing Childhood Cancer Care Costs in Two Canadian Provinces.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul C NathanDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen E BremnerToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ning LiuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sumit GuptaDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mark L GreenbergDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mary L McBrideBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Murray D KrahnInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Claire de OliveiraInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with cancer can receive care in pediatric or adult institutions. Survival often differs by locus, but little is known about relative health care utilization and costs. We estimated these in a population-based cohort of adolescents.

methodsAll Ontario adolescents (15.0-17.9 years) diagnosed with cancer between 1995 and 2010 were identified from provincial cancer registries. We compared health care resource utilization (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, same-day surgeries, outpatient chemotherapy, radiation, diagnostic/laboratory tests, physician services, home care) and costs (2012 Canadian dollars) during four discrete care phases-prediagnosis (60 days), initial (360 days), continuing (variable), and terminal (360 days)-between adolescents treated in pediatric vs adult institutions, for the whole cohort and within seven diagnostic categories. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsOf 1356 eligible adolescents, 691 and 665 were treated in adult and pediatric institutions, respectively. Hospitalization rates were higher in pediatric institutions during prediagnosis (14.9% vs 6.9%, P < .001), initial (95.1% vs 73.3%, P < .001), and continuing phases (43.2% vs 34.4%, P = .002), but similar (96.1% vs 96.3%, P = .93) during the terminal phase. Average length of stay was higher at pediatric institutions within most diagnoses and phases. For all diagnoses, median initial phase costs were higher in pediatric than adult institutions (eg, leukemia: $153 926 vs $102 418 per 360 days, P < .001; lymphoma: $65 025 vs $19 846, P < .001, respectively).

conclusionsThe costs of caring for adolescents with the same malignancy are considerably higher in pediatric than adult institutions during most phases. Resource utilization, particularly hospitalization, drives much of the cost difference, making these data applicable to other jurisdictions.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth ResourcesHospitalizationHumansMaleNeoplasmsOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrognosisRegistries

Identifiers

PMID30053118
PMCPMC6410950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.