Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053041›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2018

Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group.

Colin R Harwood, Jean-Marie Mouillon, Susanne Pohl, José Arnau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A review of the iron requirements and its determination in commercial poultry.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Phenotypic and Genomic Analysis of Swine-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  9. Multifunctional Bioactivity ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Whole genome analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic insights and evaluation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Mechanisms ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  15. Highly efficient genome editing inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In Silico and In Vitro Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin R HarwoodCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Jean-Marie MouillonDepartment of Fungal Strain Technology and Strain Approval Support, Novozymes A/S, Krogshoevej 36, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark.
Susanne PohlCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
José ArnauDepartment of Fungal Strain Technology and Strain Approval Support, Novozymes A/S, Krogshoevej 36, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the 'Bacillus subtilis group' include some of the most commercially important bacteria, used for the production of a wide range of industrial enzymes and fine biochemicals. Increasingly, group members have been developed for use as animal feed enhancers and antifungal biocontrol agents. The group has long been recognised to produce a range of secondary metabolites and, despite their long history of safe usage, this has resulted in an increased focus on their safety. Traditional methods used to detect the production of secondary metabolites and other potentially harmful compounds have relied on phenotypic tests. Such approaches are time consuming and, in some cases, lack specificity. Nowadays, accessibility to genome data and associated bioinformatical tools provides a powerful means for identifying gene clusters associated with the synthesis of secondary metabolites. This review focuses primarily on well-characterised strains of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis and their synthesis of non-ribosomally synthesised peptides and polyketides. Where known, the activities and toxicities of their secondary metabolites are discussed, together with the limitations of assays currently used to assess their toxicity. Finally, the regulatory framework under which such strains are authorised for use in the production of food and feed enzymes is also reviewed.

Indexed as

Industrial MicrobiologyBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisBacteriological TechniquesGenome, BacterialPeptidesPolyketidesPeptidesPolyketides

Identifiers

PMID30053041
PMCPMC6199538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.