Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018
High postoperative fertility rate following surgical management of colorectal endometriosis.
Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Excision versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: 5-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2019Trial
- Reproductive Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Deep Endometriosis: A Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Postoperative and long-term outcomes of nerve-sparing segmental rectal resection and complete nodular resection of rectal endometriosis.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
- Safety and Reproductive Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Nerve-Sparing Surgery for Deep Endometriosis in Infertile Women: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Endometriosis and Fertility: A Practical Guide: Results of the Working Group of the Weissensee 2025 Workshop of the Scientific Endometriosis Foundation.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Pain Relief, Gastrointestinal Function, and Recurrence After Conservative versus Radical (Segmental Resection) Surgery for Bowel Endometriosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Infertility management in patients with bowel endometriosis: the current landscape and the promise of randomised trialsFacts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- The Effect of Dienogest on Deep Endometriosis Nodules Involving the Recto-Sigmoid Colon: A Prospective Longitudinal Long-Term Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2024Article
- First live birth before surgical verification of endometriosis-a nationwide register study of 18 324 women.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Deep Endometriosis and Infertility: What Is the Impact of Surgery?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- 'Seeing is believing': arguing for diagnostic laparoscopy as a diagnostic test for endometriosis.Reproduction & fertility · 2022Review
- "The Sword in the Stone": radical excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel shaving-a single-centre experience on 703 consecutive patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Article
- Reproductive and postsurgical outcomes of infertile women with deep infiltrating endometriosis.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Conservative Management of Rectovaginal Deep Endometriosis: Shaving Should Be Considered as the Primary Surgical Approach in a High Majority of Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Predictive approach in managing voiding dysfunction after surgery for deep endometriosis: a personalized nomogram.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Endometriosis and Pregnancy: A Single Institution Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are fertility outcomes in patients surgically managed for large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum who intend to get pregnant postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: Surgical management for rectal endometriosis is followed by high pregnancy rates, with a majority of natural conceptions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Optimal management such as surgery versus first-line ART for patients with severe deep endometriosis who desire pregnancy is not defined. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study included the patients enrolled in ENDORE randomized trial who attempted pregnancy after the surgery. From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Postoperative follow-up was prolonged in 55 patients recruited at Rouen University Hospital, and varied from 50 to 79 months. No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsPatients had either conservative surgery by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery by segmental resection. One gynecologist experienced in deep endometriosis surgery performed all the procedures, assisted when required by three general surgeons experienced in colorectal surgery. Institutional review board approval was obtained to extend postoperative follow-up to 10 years after the surgery. Among patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, women who intended to get pregnant after surgery were selected and followed up postoperatively every 6 months for 2 years, then every year. Pregnancy intention, fertility outcomes, conception mode, endometriosis recurrences and digestive and urinary outcomes were rigorously recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were conception mode, the delay to conception from the day of surgery and the day when hormonal treatment was stopped, and delivery rate. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of conception after surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the 55 patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, 25 had conservative and 30 had radical surgery, and their postoperative follow-up varied from 50 to 79 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 55 patients, 36 intended to get pregnant after surgery, 23 of whom had unsuccessfully attempted to conceive for more than 12 months before surgery (63%). At the end of follow-up, 29 patients achieved pregnancy (81%), and natural conception was recorded in 17 of them (59% of conceptions). As several women had more than 1 pregnancy (range: 0-3), we recorded 37 pregnancies, 24 natural conceptions (65%) and 29 deliveries (78%). The probabilities of achieving pregnancy at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months postoperatively were 33.4% (95% CI: 20.6-51.3%), 60.6% (44.8-76.8%), 77% (61.5-89.6%) and 86.8% (72.8-95.8%), respectively. Women who had been advised to attempt natural conception achieved pregnancy significantly earlier than patients referred for ART (P = 0.008). In infertile patients, the postoperative pregnancy rate was 74%, and 53% of conceptions were natural. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main outcomes of the original trial were related to digestive function and not to fertility. Several factors impacting fertility could not be revealed due to small sample size. The study included a high percentage of young women with an overall satisfactory prognosis for fertility, as patients' median age was 28 years. The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <2 cm in length. Only one skilled gynecologic surgeon performed all the procedures. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsFirst-line surgery can be considered in patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and pregnancy intention. Patients receiving advice from experienced surgeons on conception modes were more likely to conceive faster after surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research program for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The original randomized trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT 01291576).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.