Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30052926›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2018

Primer set 2.0 for highly parallel qPCR array targeting antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements.

Robert D Stedtfeld, Xueping Guo, Tiffany M Stedtfeld, Hongjie Sheng, Maggie R Williams, Kristin Hauschild, Santosh Gunturu, Leo Tift, Fang Wang, Adina Howe and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Robert D StedtfeldDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Xueping GuoState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tiffany M StedtfeldDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Hongjie ShengDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Maggie R WilliamsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Kristin HauschildCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Santosh GunturuCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Leo TiftCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Fang WangDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Adina HoweDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA.
Benli ChaiCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Daqiang YinState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
James R ColeDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
James M TiedjeDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Syed A HashshamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

Funding

VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS--QUANTIFYING THEIR MOVEMENT IN THE UNSATURATED ZONEP42ES004911 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie J Bernard · 1989 to 2026
$64.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-throughput antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) qPCR array, initially published in 2012, is increasingly used to quantify resistance and mobile determinants in environmental matrices. Continued utility of the array; however, necessitates improvements such as removing or redesigning questionable primer sets, updating targeted genes and coverage of available sequences. Towards this goal, a new primer design tool (EcoFunPrimer) was used to aid in identification of conserved regions of diverse genes. The total number of assays used for diverse genes was reduced from 91 old primer sets to 52 new primer sets, with only a 10% loss in sequence coverage. While the old and new array both contain 384 primer sets, a reduction in old primer sets permitted 147 additional ARGs and mobile genetic elements to be targeted. Results of validating the updated array with a mock community of strains resulted in over 98% of tested instances incurring true positive/negative calls. Common queries related to sensitivity, quantification and conventional data analysis (e.g. Ct cutoff value, and estimated genomic copies without standard curves) were also explored. A combined list of new and previously used primer sets is provided with a recommended set based on redesign of primer sets and results of validation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDNA PrimersDrug Resistance, MicrobialInterspersed Repetitive SequencesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID30052926
PMCPMC7250373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.