Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30052811›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.

Huldrych F Günthard, Vincent Calvez, Roger Paredes, Deenan Pillay, Robert W Shafer, Annemarie M Wensing, Donna M Jacobsen, Douglas D Richman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Utilizing HIV Proviral DNA to Assess for the Presence of HIV Drug Resistance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Strategic use of salvage long-acting antiretrovirals in the setting of resistance.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antifungal Susceptibility andBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huldrych F GünthardUniversity Hospital Zürich and Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Vincent CalvezPierre et Marie Curie University and Pitié-Salpêtriere Hospital, Paris, France.
Roger ParedesInfectious Diseases Service and IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Deenan PillayUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Robert W ShaferStanford University Medical School, California.
Annemarie M WensingUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Donna M JacobsenInternational Antiviral Society-USA, San Francisco.
Douglas D RichmanVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and University of California San Diego.

Funding

HIV Drug Resistance DatabaseR24AI136618 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT William SHAFER · 2018 to 2026
$7.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI136618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contemporary antiretroviral therapies (ART) and management strategies have diminished both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment failure and the acquired resistance to drugs in resource-rich regions, but transmission of drug-resistant viruses has not similarly decreased. In low- and middle-income regions, ART roll-out has improved outcomes, but has resulted in increasing acquired and transmitted resistances. Our objective was to review resistance to ART drugs and methods to detect it, and to provide updated recommendations for testing and monitoring for drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals. Methods: A volunteer panel of experts appointed by the International Antiviral (formerly AIDS) Society-USA reviewed relevant peer-reviewed data that were published or presented at scientific conferences. Recommendations were rated according to the strength of the recommendation and quality of the evidence, and reached by full panel consensus. Results: Resistance testing remains a cornerstone of ART. It is recommended in newly-diagnosed individuals and in patients in whom ART has failed. Testing for transmitted integrase strand-transfer inhibitor resistance is currently not recommended, but this may change as more resistance emerges with widespread use. Sanger-based and next-generation sequencing approaches are each suited for genotypic testing. Testing for minority variants harboring drug resistance may only be considered if treatments depend on a first-generation nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Different HIV-1 subtypes do not need special considerations regarding resistance testing. Conclusions: Testing for HIV drug resistance in drug-naive individuals and in patients in whom antiretroviral drugs are failing, and the appreciation of the role of testing, are crucial to the prevention and management of failure of ART.

Indexed as

InternationalityAnti-HIV AgentsDeveloping CountriesDrug Resistance, ViralHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansSocieties, ScientificUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID30052811
PMCPMC6321850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.