Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30052631›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

A prospective cohort study comparing household contact and water Vibrio cholerae isolates in households of cholera patients in rural Bangladesh.

Christine Marie George, Khaled Hasan, Shirajum Monira, Zillur Rahman, K M Saif-Ur-Rahman, Mahamud-Ur Rashid, Fatema Zohura, Tahmina Parvin, Md Sazzadul Islam Bhuyian, Md Toslim Mahmud and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Vibriosis-associated acute kidney injury : Incidence and outcome.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Lancet. Microbe · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine Marie GeorgeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9219-0953
Khaled HasanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Shirajum MoniraInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5059-9678
Zillur RahmanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
K M Saif-Ur-RahmanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8702-7094
Mahamud-Ur RashidInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3785-2122
Fatema ZohuraInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tahmina ParvinInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-8046
Md Sazzadul Islam BhuyianInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Toslim MahmudInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-6277-8617
Shan LiUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jamie PerinDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-6620
Camille MorganDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-0908
Munshi MustafizInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5802-1731
R Bradley SackDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
David A SackDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
O Colin StineUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-3752
Munirul AlamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Epidemiology and Ecology of Cholera in AfricaR01AI123422 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Kay Debes, DAVID A SACK · 2017 to 2026
$6.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousehold contacts of cholera patients are at a 100 times higher risk of developing cholera than the general population. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of V. cholerae infections among household contacts of cholera patients in a rural setting in Bangladesh, to identify risk factors for V. cholerae infections among this population, and to investigate transmission pathways of V. cholerae using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsStool from household contacts, source water and stored water samples were collected from cholera patient households on Day 1, 3, 5, and 7 after the presentation of the index patient at a health facility. Two hundred thirty clinical and water V. cholerae isolates were analyzed by MLVA. Thirty seven percent of households had at least one household contact with a V. cholerae infection. Thirteen percent of households had V. cholerae in their water source, and 27% had V. cholerae in stored household drinking water. Household contacts with V. cholerae in their water source had a significantly higher odds of symptomatic cholera (Odds Ratio (OR): 5.49, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.07, 28.08). Contacts consuming street vended food had a significantly higher odds of a V. cholerae infection (OR: 9.45, 95% CI: 2.14, 41.72). Older age was significantly associated with a lower odds of a V. cholerae infection (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.99). Households with both water and clinical V. cholerae-positive samples all had isolates that were closely related by MLVA. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings emphasize the need for interventions targeting water treatment and food hygiene to reduce V. cholerae infections.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCholeraDisease OutbreaksFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleFresh WaterHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinisatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID30052631
PMCPMC6063393
OpenAlexW2883027555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.