ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2018
Characterization of FGD5 Expression in Primary Breast Cancers and Lymph Node Metastases.
Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: a novel missense variant ofFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- The role of long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 in cancer.Bioengineered · 2022Review
- Diagnostic significance of serum FGD5-AS1 and its predictive value for the development of cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Integrative Multi-Omics Research in Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- The molecular profile of breast cancer: primary tumor versus corresponding lymph node metastases.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faciogenital dysplasia 5 ( FGD5) amplification drives tumor cell proliferation, and is present in 9.5% of breast cancers. We describe FGD5 expression, assess associations between FGD5 amplification and FGD5 expression, and assess FGD5 expression in relation to proliferation and prognosis. FGD5 immunohistochemistry was done on primary tumors ( n=829) and lymph node metastases ( n=231) from a cohort of Norwegian patients. We explored associations between FGD5 amplification, FGD5 expression, and proliferation, and analyzed the prognostic value of FGD5 expression by estimating cumulative risks of death and hazard ratios (HRs). We identified nuclear and cytoplasmic expression in 64% and 73% of primary tumors, respectively, and found an association between gene amplification and nuclear expression ( p=0.02). The proportion of cases with FGD5 expression was higher in lymph node metastases, compared with primary tumors ( p=0.004 for nuclear and p=0.001 for cytoplasmic staining). Neither proliferation nor prognosis was associated with FGD5 expression (age-adjusted HR 1.12 [95% confidence interval = 0.89-1.41] for nuclear expression; and 0.88 [95% CI = 0.70-1.12] for cytoplasmic expression). FGD5 is expressed in a high proportion of breast cancers and lymph node metastases. There was a correlation between FGD5 amplification and nuclear expression, but no association between FGD5 expression and proliferation or prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.